Related Issues

Related Issues

ICYMI: Senator Coons, Ebola Czar warn Congress must act now on Zika before it’s too late

WASHINGTON – In case you missed it, Huffington Post reporter Laura Bassett interviewed U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Ron Klain, the administration’s former Ebola coordinator, about why Congress must pass funding to try and stop Zika in its tracks as the virus poses an increasing threat to the United States.

Senator Coons was a leading voice in the Senate in calling for a strong response from the United States in the fight against Ebola. In December of 2014, he became the first Senator to travel to Liberia after the virus started spreading there earlier that year. 

Huffington Post: Ebola Czar Rips Congress On Zika: ‘The Mosquitoes Are Not Going To Wait’

By Laura Bassett

As temperatures rise in the United States and mosquitoes become more active, public health officials warn that insects carrying the Zika virus are going to start infecting Americans in the southern and southeastern states. But nearly four months after the Obama administration requested $1.9 billion to try to stop the epidemic in its tracks, Congress has failed to do anything at all about Zika. 

“People hear the House passed one thing, the Senate passed something else. What that means is nothing has passed. Not a single penny has gone out of the Capitol to fight Zika,” Ron Klain, the administration’s former Ebola response coordinator, told The Huffington Post this week. “Now there’s a conference committee that’s going to have to try to reconcile these bills. Well, the mosquitoes are not going to wait for the conference committee, OK? It’s June. Temperatures are rising.”  

Zika, a virus transmitted by mosquitoes or through sexual contact that has been linked to devastating birth defects, has already caused thousands of babies to be born with abnormally small heads and severe developmental disabilities throughout South and Latin America. While the several hundred confirmed cases of Zika in the continental U.S. thus far were all contracted overseas, Klain said that’s going to change in the very near future as mosquito season ramps up.

“We’re going to see people catch Zika in the United States who’ve never traveled, never gone overseas,” he said. “We’re going start to see this happen in the next few weeks while Congress is busy debating this… The majority [in the House and Senate] is preventing a response from being mounted that could help save American lives and prevent this horrible tragedy of babies being born with Zika-related microcephaly.” 

Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and his Democratic colleagues have been pushing to fully fund the administration’s request, and the GOP-controlled Senate was able to agree on and pass a bill appropriating $1.1 billion for Zika. But the bill the House passed would give the administration less than half of that, and Congress left for vacation on May 27 without passing a compromise bill.  

Coons, who was closely involved in the response to the 2014 Ebola crisis, even visiting Liberia in the midst of the deadly epidemic, ripped into his Republican colleagues this week for their lack of response to Zika and other major public health crises. 

“Take a look at three different public health challenges facing our country right now: water pollution in Flint, response to a nationwide heroin and opioid addiction crisis, and responding to Zika,” Coons said. “All three of these are issues where we’ve moved forward responsible funding proposals to resolve them, and they’ve been bottled up on the floor of the Senate for months.” 

“It ought to outrage the American people that our Congress — and in particular, Republicans in Congress, just to be blunt — are not agreeing to fund things that historically we would have been able to achieve quick, bipartisan, responsible answers to,” he went on. “Because these are legitimate public health concerns.”  

Instead of funding Zika prevention efforts using emergency appropriations money, Republicans in Congress have suggested that the more fiscally responsible move would be to take money that’s been designated to fight Ebola and put it toward Zika prevention instead. Democrats and public health experts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention strongly object to that idea, because the Ebola epidemic is not yet completely under control in West Africa and could easily pose a worldwide threat again.

“We narrowly avoided a global epidemic of Ebola,” Coons said. “It almost broke out. And so to take the funds that are dedicated to an ongoing response, both in the United States in our public health system and in West Africa, and move it over to a response for Zika — while I understand the temptation to be fiscally conservative, [it] misunderstands what public health emergency response is all about, which is getting ahead of the problem.” 

Last week, the first baby with Zika-related microcephaly was born in the continental United States. Each child with microcephaly is expected to cost the health care system up to $10 million

 

“The babies who are going to be born with this disease, this horrible impairment of microcephaly — they are going to suffer from this for however short or long their lives are,” Klain said. “And they are going to be a sad human testament to the refusal of some in Congress to fund what we need to do to prevent it.”

 

Videos produced by Christine Conetta.

 

 

Delaware delegation announces grant award to Delaware’s Department of Labor to expand apprenticeship program

WILMINGTON, Del. – Today, U.S. Senators Tom Carper and Chris Coons and Representative John Carney (all D-Del) announced a grant award from the U.S. Department of Labor to Delaware’s Department of Labor to help expand apprenticeship programs. 

Delaware will receive $200,000 to help integrate apprenticeships into their education and workforce systems; engage industry and other partners to expand apprenticeships to new sectors and new populations at scale; conduct outreach and work with employers to start news apprenticeship programs; promote greater inclusion and diversity in apprenticeship programs, and implement state incentives and system reforms.

These grants are part of ApprenticeshipUSA, the department’s coordinated effort with industry and education leaders, nonprofits, and local governments to highlight the benefits of apprenticeships and expand the use of this time-tested, earn-while-you-learn model.

“I’ve always said that one of the best things you can do for someone is to help them find a good job because a job is about more than just a paycheck,” said Senator Carper. “A good job also gives us a sense of pride and accomplishment, especially when we have the tools to succeed in that line of work. The Department of Labor’s apprenticeship program not only helps to connect Delawareans with rewarding careers, but also provides workers with the high-quality training needed to meet the specific needs of employers and stay competitive in the 21st century economy. An investment in this program is an investment in our workforce, and I’m pleased that the department is prioritizing this program that benefits job-seekers and employers across our state.” 

“Continuing to expand career opportunities and training for the working middle-class is key to the economic health of this country,” said Senator Coons. “This wonderful news from the Department of Labor will help more Delawareans from the New Castle County Vocational Technical School District, Sussex Tech and Polytech start their career off on the right foot by developing marketable skills and encouraging them to pursue challenging and rewarding professions.” 

“Apprenticeships provide a crucial means for Delawareans to gain new experience and broaden their expertise,” said Congressman Carney.  “Because of this grant, more people will develop skills that are in high-demand and be in a better position to take advantage of new opportunities.  This is an investment in Delaware workers that I know will pay off.”

“This grant is so important because it allows us to continue providing opportunities to Delaware residents for valuable training and experience,” said Patrice Gilliam-Johnson, Secretary of the Delaware Department of Labor. “We’re grateful for our congressional delegation for making sure Delaware is included in the allocation of this much-needed resource. 

According to the U.S. Department of Labor, 87 percent of apprentices are employed after completing their programs, with an average starting wage above $50,000 per year. The return on investment for employers is substantial, as studies indicate that for every dollar spent on apprenticeship, employers receive an average of $1.47 return in increased productivity, reduced waste and greater front-line innovation. 

Apprenticeships are offered in a variety of occupations. The majority of apprenticeships are four years in length or 8000 hours of on-the-job training. For each year of training, a minimum of 144 hours of related instruction is required. Upon completion of the required on-the-job training and related instruction, the apprentice is eligible for Journey papers. A journeyperson is nationally recognized as having a well-rounded ability in all phases of his or her trade. For additional information about the Delaware apprenticeship program

Senator Coons’ op-ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer commemorates 50th anniversary of RFK’s “Ripples of Hope” speech

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, published an oped in today’s Philadelphia Inquirer and spoke on the Senate floor to honor the 50th anniversary of Senator Robert F. Kennedy’s historic speech at the University of Cape Town on June 6, 1966. In the op-ed and in his remarks on the floor, Senator Coons discussed some of the challenges facing the United States and South Africa as both countries seek to strengthen democratic institutions and confront legacies of discrimination and inequality.  

Full audio and video of the speech is available here: http://bit.ly/1t5qN0iFull transcript of the speech is below.

The oped can be read here, and the full text is below: 

RFK’s message to South Africa – and the U.S. 

By Chris Coons

Last week, I led a group of my colleagues on a trip to South Africa. Along with Rep. John Lewis (D., Ga.), a hero of America’s civil rights movement, and Kerry Kennedy, president of RFK Human Rights and daughter of the late Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, we traveled to South Africa to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the senator’s historic “Ripples of Hope” speech at the University of Cape Town. 

On June 6, 1966, speaking to a nation struggling through the cruel injustices of apartheid, Kennedy began his speech by describing “a land in which the native inhabitants were at first subdued, but relations with whom remain a problem to this day; a land which defined itself on a hostile frontier; . . . a land which was once the importer of slaves, and now must struggle to wipe out the last traces of that former bondage.”

Kennedy then paused before concluding, “I refer, of course, to the United States of America.” 

As Kennedy made clear, America and South Africa share more than we may realize. While there are fundamental differences between our two countries, we have similar stories to tell and many lessons we can learn from each other.

Our two constitutional democracies have been supported by courageous and principled leaders, but we have both learned that nations do not endure because of individuals – they endure because of institutions.

Today, South Africa’s postapartheid nonracial democracy is struggling to deliver on the promise of its ambitious founding principles and to transform its economy to generate opportunity for all its citizens. Meanwhile, the United States is mired in dysfunctional politics, and significant portions of our population justifiably believe we have failed to make even modest progress on the problems we face. 

Our nations share deeply embedded legacies of racial discrimination and division from which we have not yet healed – in fact, civil rights activist James Meredith was shot by a white gunman in Mississippi during Kennedy’s trip to South Africa. 

We share complex histories of struggles balancing the roles of violence and nonviolence in seeking justice and equality under the law. 

We share flawed criminal justice systems that disproportionately punish our citizens of color, and we share imperfect education systems that don’t do enough to educate and empower them.

We share remarkable constitutions and inspiring foundational documents – South Africa’s Freedom Charter and our own Declaration of Independence – whose soaring principles say powerful things, but whose lived experiences have fallen short.

We each struggle to find the most appropriate way to welcome and incorporate millions of undocumented immigrants and to prevent tensions associated with xenophobia.

Yet despite our common shortcomings, we also share a commitment to democracy framed by strong original documents, respect for the rule of law, and independent judiciaries – institutions created and sustained by the likes of Nelson Mandela and George Washington, who as founding presidents stepped down from their offices willingly out of respect for their constitutions.

We share centuries-long traditions of faith and religion, which were at times twisted into justifications for discrimination and prejudice, but which have also served as the guiding light for the nonviolent efforts to achieve justice. It is these very faith traditions that have inspired some of our most storied leaders, from Congressman Lewis to Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

As we look back 50 years, we see that progress is possible, but Kennedy’s observation in 1966 that “humanity sometimes progresses very slowly indeed” remains true.

Today, South Africa, with its independent judiciary, a strong public protector office, and vibrant media, is showing how important civic institutions are to sustaining democracy and preserving the progress of humanity. 

In the years to come, the United States and South Africa must look to each other as we continue to heal the damage of racial injustice, reverse growing economic inequality, and protect our evolving experiments in democracy. 

While both countries have been blessed with the inspirational leadership of exceptional figures, nations over time cannot rely on the constant presence of such gifted leaders. Nations must endure because of strong institutions. Institutions, in turn, endure because we as individuals try every day to make them a little better.

Two months after he returned to the United States, Kennedy reflected on his Cape Town speech. “I acknowledged the United States, like other countries, still had far to go to keep the promises of our Constitution,” he said. “What was important . . . was that we were trying.”

Twenty-five years later, Nelson Mandela told an American audience, “I am not a saint, unless you think of a saint as a sinner who keeps on trying.”

The people of the United States must keep on trying. The people of South Africa must keep on trying.

We must all keep on trying because, as President Obama said, “action and ideas are not enough. No matter how right, they must be chiseled into law and institutions.”

We have a lot of trying left to do, and from each other, we have much to learn – and much to teach the rest of the world. Let us face these challenges together.

SENATOR CHRIS COONS

REMARKS AS DELIVERED ON THE SENATE FLOOR

50 YEARS AFTER RFK’S “RIPPLES OF HOPE” SPEECH

Madame President, on this exact date a half-century ago, then-Senator Robert F. Kennedy delivered a powerful speech in Cape Town in South Africa; South Africa, a nation that was then struggling through the cruel injustices of apartheid.

It was the conclusion of a remarkable trip to South Africa in which Bobby Kennedy visited the Nobel Peace-prize winning Chief Luthuli; visited Soweto; visited the University of Wits up in Johannesburg; and spoke with students at the University of Cape Town.

And last week, I had the opportunity to help lead a congressional delegation to commemorate Bobby Kennedy’s historic journey and his famous “Ripples of Hope” speech that he delivered in his visit. The trip offered all of us an opportunity to reflect on the parallels between America’s civil rights movement and South Africa’s liberation struggle, and to renew the conversation of reconciliation as both countries face legacies that remain both difficult and unresolved.

More importantly, Madame President, as South Africa and the United States face serious challenges to the very institutions that underpin and preserve our democracies, this trip served as a reminder us that while our constitutional orders may be supported by courageous and principled leaders through critical moments in our history, nations don’t endure because of a few charismatic and historic individuals – they endure because of institutions.

I was honored to be joined on this trip by a bipartisan group of colleagues from the House of Representatives, including, most importantly, Congressman John Lewis of Georgia, a hero of America’s own civil rights movement, and Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland, and five others. 

There was also a “Ripples of Hope” delegation that traveled alongside us that included RFK’s children, Kerry Kennedy and Rory Kennedy. Kerry’s now president of the RFK Human Rights foundation, and more than a dozen members of the Kennedy family of several generations, as well as the leaders and some members of the Faith and Politics Institute.

It is Faith and Politics that annually organizes, under the leadership of Congressman John Lewis, the civil rights pilgrimage of members of Congress, Republican and Democrat, House and Senate, who retrace the steps of the famous Selma march, which he helped lead, as well as the pivotal events of both Montgomery and Birmingham at the height of the American civil rights movement. So, these three organizations together – the Faith and Politics Institute; the RFK foundation; and the congressional delegation – met up together in South Africa.

At the time of Bobby Kennedy’s visit 50 years ago, South Africa was deep in the throes of apartheid, with a liberation movement that had been decapitated in the Lilisleaf raid of 1963 and pushed far underground. Black South Africans at that point lived in fear and their leaders were either imprisoned or in exile, and the National Party and South African security forces controlled nearly every state institution. As author Evan Thomas has described it, “nowhere was injustice more stark or the prospect for change bleaker than South Africa in 1966.”

RFK would later write about what he called “the dilemma of South Africa: a land of enormous promise and potential, aspiration and achievement – yet a land also of repression and sadness, darkness and cruelty,” as of 1966. To put it plainly and simply, apartheid was a brutal form of racial subjugation.

In the midst of an environment in which white supremacy was codified by law and most anti-apartheid leaders and stalwarts were imprisoned or on the run, Bobby Kennedy was invited to give the University of Cape Town’s “Day of Affirmation” address.

Kennedy began his speech at Jameson Hall describing, “a land in which the native inhabitants were at first subdued, but relations with whom remain a problem to this day; a land which defined itself on a hostile frontier; … a land which once was the importer of slaves, and now must struggle to wipe out the last traces of that former bondage.”

RFK then paused before concluding, “I refer, of course, to the United States of America.” As you listen to the audio recording of his speech you can then hear a ripple of recognition and applause that Kennedy, who many thought was introducing his speech about South Africa, was instead recognizing the remarkable parallels between our two nations.

As Kennedy spoke to a large crowd that had waited in the cold for hours, he made it clear with this opening that he came not to preach to the people of South Africa from our supposed position of superiority due to the length of our democratic experiment, but to share and to learn from our common legacies and challenges.

Then and now, the differences between the United States and South Africa are profound and real. Yet Americans and South Africans do share more than we might widely recognize. We have similar stories to tell, and we have many lessons that we can and should learn from each other.

Today, more than twenty years after the end of apartheid, South Africa’s post-apartheid nonracial democracy is struggling to deliver on the promise of its ambitious founding principles, and to transform its economy to generate opportunity for all its citizens. Meanwhile, here in the United States, we are mired in dysfunctional politics, and many Americans justifiably believe we have failed to make even modest progress on the economic and social challenges we face.

Our countries also share a deeply embedded history of racial discrimination and division from which we have not yet healed – a shared struggle exemplified by the fact that fifty years ago, during Kennedy’s trip to South Africa, American civil rights activist James Meredith was shot by a white gunman while he marched for voting rights in Mississippi.

We share complex histories of struggles balancing the role of violence and nonviolence in seeking justice and equality under the law.

We share, today, flawed criminal justice systems that disproportionately punish our citizens of color, and we share, sadly, imperfect education systems that don’t do enough to support them.

We also continue to share, today, a struggle to find the most appropriate way to welcome and incorporate literally millions of undocumented immigrants and to prevent tensions associated with xenophobia, something we’ve seen both here in the United States today and we also heard about in South Africa last week.

Yet despite our common shortcomings, we share remarkable constitutions and inspiring foundational documents, South Africa’s Freedom Charter and our own Declaration of Independence, whose soaring principles say powerful, inspiring things, but whose lived experiences have so far fallen short.

We also share a powerful commitment to democracy framed by the strong original documents, respect for the rule of law, and capable and independent judiciaries – institutions created and sustained by the work of many over hundreds of years, but – where we share also a striking foundational moment – our president George Washington and their president Nelson Mandela, both as founding presidents, stepped down from their offices willingly and set powerful precedents of respect for constitutions and term limits.

We also share the fact that we are deeply religious nations, across all racial backgrounds and all income levels, both South Africa and the United States have deep and long traditions of faith and religion, which have powerfully influenced our public lives. These, of course, are traditions which were at times in the past twisted into justifications for prejudice and racial discrimination, but which also served as guiding lights for the nonviolent efforts to achieve justice and reconciliation.

If you think about it, these shared faith traditions have inspired some of our most powerful leaders. 

Congressman John Lewis, who was with us on this trip, who was himself beaten, bloodied, and arrested 40 times in the streets of the south fighting for equality under the law; who led the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; who, as the leader of the march on Selma in 1966, encountered state troopers armed with guns, and tear gas, and clubs wrapped in barbed wire – as he crossed the Edmund Pettus Bridge, and simply said before the onslaught that later became known as Bloody Sunday, “let us pray.”

We all remember that Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., was one of the most important leaders of our civil rights movement, the Baptist preacher and president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference; who, when imprisoned in a Birmingham jail, wrote that “Human progress never rolls in on wheels of inevitability; it comes through the tireless efforts of men willing to be coworkers with God.” 

Similarly, in South Africa, some of their most important leaders were clergymen, and one of the most moving moments for me on our trip was the chance to revisit a fellowship I’ve shared with Archbishop Desmond Tutu, for whom I worked, briefly, 30 years ago – Tutu, the Anglican bishop who led the South African Council of Churches and fought for decades against apartheid; who was lifted up and recognized with the Nobel Peace Prize back in 1984 and, many years later, would receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom here in the United States; and who ultimately chaired the post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which engaged in the very hard work of convening whole committees of both those who committed the atrocities of apartheid and their victims in a disciplined, constitutionally-created nationwide effort at reconciliation. It was Archbishop Desmond Tutu who wrote, “Hate has no place in the house of God.”

Madame President, in both the United States and South Africa, the language used to challenge the unjust structures and actions of the government and civil society at the time were rooted in Biblically-based questions of justice and righteousness – and made possible national conversations about forgiveness and reconciliation.

Some of the most striking and powerful witnesses offered quietly on the sides of our journey were from two Americans who were participants in the Faith and Politics civil rights pilgrimage this year in Charleston, South Carolina. They were survivors of the horrible events at the Emmanuel AME church in Charleston, a tragedy in which relatives and friends were savagely murdered during a Bible reflection prayer session – a tragedy from which two survivors, Felecia and Polly, traveled with us to South Africa last week with the Kennedy delegation. It was many of those who survived that tragic event in Charleston, South Carolina, who just a few days later, in confronting the gunman, were able and willing, out of the depths of their faith, to say publicly, “We have no room for hate. We have to forgive.” 

And I’ll remind you that one of the things that is most impressive about Congressman John Lewis, from his own experience in our civil rights movement, was his ability to reconcile and forgive. Decades after a member of the Ku Klux Klan beat John Lewis and many other Freedom Riders in the summer of 1961, the now-United States Congressman John Lewis welcomed a Klansman who had actually beaten him decades before to his office here in Washington, and said, as he’s repeated many times on our civil rights pilgrimage, “I accept your apology. I forgive you.”

One of the most striking aspects of Nelson Mandela’s leadership as the first president of a truly free, nonracial South Africa was his own capacity for forgiveness. Twenty years after he was released from prison, an imprisonment that lasted 27 years and robbed him of his opportunity to be a free man, to see his own children grow up, to be a contributing part of his society – an apartheid imprisonment that took away virtually his entire adult life – twenty years after his release from prison, Mandela invited to dinner at his own home one of his former jailers, a man with whom he had become friends, saying their friendship “reinforced my belief in the essential humanity of even those who had kept me behind bars.”

Think about the depths of that forgiveness. As our own President Obama has put it, referring to Mandela by his familiar name, “it took a man like Madiba to free not just the prisoner, but the jailer as well.” 

It is individuals like John Lewis and Nelson Mandela who set the example of healing, forgiveness, and reconciliation that may ultimately allow us to move forward from our foundational sins of slavery and discrimination. And it is the powerful witness of those from South Carolina, from the Emmanuel AME church, who have challenged us anew in an era of Black Lives Matter concerns and protests, to redouble our efforts to achieve real repentance by those weigh violence against our racial minorities in the United States and those who still need reconciliation and forgiveness. 

Last week, our congressional delegation had a chance to break bread with Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and we heard from him discussions about the vital importance of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which allowed the people of South Africa to attempt to work together past the bitterness and hatred of apartheid. There is much work undone in South Africa today, as I referenced, but the transformational impact of the TRC, of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, is beyond doubt in that it made it possible for both the perpetrators and the victims of apartheid to see each other face to face, and to engage in many acts of contrition and reconciliation. 

We had a chance on our trip to South Africa to visit Liliesleaf Farm, just outside of Johannesburg, which was the site where the leaders of the underground anti-apartheid movement, the leaders newly-led by Nelson Mandela and Walter Sisulu and Andrew Mlangeni, the African National Congress, where all of those leaders were at one time picked up by the South African security police; this was in July 1963. We had a chance to meet with and hear from many of the stalwarts at that stage of the struggle, from Walter Sisulu’s son, Max, from Mlangeni himself – now in his late 80s – about their struggles following the raid and the Rivonia Treason Trials, after which there were life sentences imposed on many of those captured at Liliesleaf.

We also visited Nelson Mandela’s home in Soweto and his jail cell on Robben Island, where he served out 18 years of his very long sentence. And we had a remarkable and moving tour of Robben Island, provided for us by Ahmed Kathrada, who goes by the causal term ‘Kathy,’ who talked with us about his experience on Robben Island, and about how they maintained discipline, how they were able to continue to work together to shore up each others’ spirits, as they coped with year after year of brutal conditions and hard prison labor. One of the most striking things for me was to hear from this man, Mr. Kathrada, the absence of bitterness, the absence of vitriol, after his life, too, was marred by decades of imprisonment by the apartheid regime.

It wasn’t just members of our delegation who had an opportunity to learn from these conversations – it was also many South Africans who had an opportunity to hear from our Congressman, John Lewis, as he spoke passionately in several different settings, both in Johannesburg and in Cape Town, about his experience in our civil rights movement. It was uplifting to see him mobbed afterwards by young South Africans everywhere he went, who wanted to meet with him, hear from him, take pictures with him, and reflect once again on the common and constructive legacies of our two nations.

As we look back at 50 years, we see from the struggles of people like John Lewis and Nelson Mandela that while progress is possible, RFK’s observation that “humanity sometimes progresses very slowly indeed” remains true.

And humanity has much more work to do. 

Today in South Africa, over half of the black population lives in poverty – compared to less than one recent of the white population. Average annual household income is over $25,000 for white South Africans – yet barely $4,000 for blacks. South Africa’s unemployment rate is seven percent for whites – and over 30 percent for blacks, and much higher in the townships and for younger South Africans.

Even when black students make it to South Africa’s universities, like the University of Cape Town, they’re much less likely to graduate. I have many more statistics I could quote, but by important measures, inequality between whites and blacks has actually increased since the end of apartheid in South Africa in 1994. 

But these disparities, Madame President, are not unique to South Africa. A Pew Research Center study found that in 2013 in the United States, white households had a median worth thirteen times greater than that of our African-American households – the largest discrepancy in decades in our country. And our Department of Education recently found that, compared to white students, black students in America are far less likely to have access to preschool and advanced high school courses, are much more likely to be suspended, and are much less likely to complete college.

These divides, sadly, extend to our legal system as well. On average, black men in America receive sentences 20 percent longer than white men who commit identical crimes. The population of my home state of Delaware is 22 percent black – ?yet two-thirds of our prison population is African-American.

Behind all these challenging and difficult statistics lies the very real challenge of how to be true to our foundational values and yet find a path forward that creates both growth and empowerment, opportunity and progress, for the peoples of both our countries.

By any measure, we have more work to do. Echoing the words of Congressman Lewis, we have come a great distance, but we have a great distance further to go.

Madame President, in that June 6th address fifty years ago, Bobby Kennedy described the plane that brought him to South Africa, from which “we could see no national boundaries, no vast gulfs or high walls dividing people from people.”

Today, globalization has proven that the boundaries we build between “us” and “them” – whether by race or religion, party or nationality – are indeed what RFK called them: “illusions of differences.”

Still, we need to find the courage and the strength to tackle these problems, to not fall victim to the forces of apathy and complacency. We must find solutions that work for each country in its own context.

Exactly 50 years ago today, Madame President, Bobby Kennedy told South Africans, “Few will have the greatness to bend history, but each of us can work to change a small portion of the events, and then the total – all of these acts – will be written in the history of this generation.”

That, in some ways, was the enduring power of his best-known quote from that speech, about how each man, each individual, man or woman, who stands up for an ideal, acts to improve the lots of others, or strikes out against injustice, sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and all those ripples in combination can form a wall of water which knocks down even the greatest of impediments to progress and justice, such as the walls of apartheid.

Madame President, it was these very ripples that sent forth hope to all South Africans in 1966, when Bobby Kennedy spoke. It was these ripples that sustained Mandela’s struggle over decades, and that prompted the son of an African immigrant to America to take his first steps towards a career in public service – a decision that ultimately brought him to our presidency today.

It was this same commitment to equality and justice that led me, 30 years ago, to travel to South Africa and work for the Council of Churches there, under the tutelage of both Reverend Paul Verryn and Archbishop Desmond Tutu. 

And it was this same experience, reflected in Bishop Tutu’s phrase, “Ubuntu,” the distinctly South African idea that, as President Obama has put it, “we are all bound together in ways that are invisible to the eye; that there is a oneness to humanity.”

I met a remarkable range of men and women, young and old, leaders of this generation and the last, in South Africa in this past week, and was reminded in all of our conversations – on Robben Island, in Lilisleaf, with young entrepreneurs in Soweto, with business leaders trying to grow the economy and create opportunity, with those from every background in South Africa – that all of these men and women have fought that fight, sending forth ripples of hope that brought the mighty walls of apartheid crashing down and built a more equal nation in its place twenty years ago, and that have to continue to be part of this progress today and going forward.

Bobby Kennedy’s visit 50 years ago played a critical role in changing the tone and tempo of the anti-apartheid struggle at the time. 

Margaret Marshall, a student activist then in South Africa, recalled that at the time of his visit in 1966, “the world seemed to ignore us. … But Bobby Kennedy was different. He reminded us… we were not alone. That we were part of a great and noble tradition, the re-affirmation of nobility in every human person. We all had felt alienated. It felt to me that what I was doing was small and meaningless. He put us back into the great sweep of history.”

Last week, speaking at the same university at which her father provided this vital infusion of optimism a half-century ago, Kerry Kennedy told us these ripples of hope didn’t have to come from governments, or militaries, or corporations – they can come from anyone, anywhere, from seemingly average people, just as was the case with Margaret Marshall five decades ago.

Today, they come from us. From the citizens we represent across this nation, and the people struggling across South Africa, to find, together, a better and brighter future.

In the months and years to come, the United States and South Africa can and should look to each other for lessons and inspirations as we continue to work to heal the damage of racial injustice, to reverse the trends of economic inequality, and to protect our experiments in democracy. 

As South Africa prepares for upcoming municipal elections in August, and as we prepare for our own national elections in November, both nations are entering periods in our electoral history where our institutions of democracy and governance are being challenged.

Today, South Africa is showing just how important to the sustainment of democracy it is to have not just a charismatic, or world-historical, or forgiving heads of state, or individuals leading churches, but also a very strong public protector, independent judiciary, vibrant media, and engaged electorate.

In America and South Africa, I believe our institutions will protect and preserve our democracies.

These institutions must be, of course, inspired, led by courageous and principled individuals like Senator Kennedy, like Congressman Lewis, like President Mandela, but, Madame President, nations don’t endure because of individuals. Nations must endure because of strong institutions. 

Two months after he returned to the United States, Kennedy reflected on his speech of 50 years ago today and said, “I acknowledged the United States, like other countries, still had far to go to keep the promises of our Constitution. What was important,” he said, “was that we were trying.”

And in 1991, when Nelson Mandela came here to speak, he told an American audience, “I am not a saint, unless you think of a saint as a sinner who keeps on trying.”

The people of the United States must keep on trying to be true to our foundational values and documents, and the people of South Africa must, as well.

We must all keep on trying, as President Obama said, because “action and ideas are not enough. No matter how right, they must be chiseled into law and institutions” that will endure.

We have a lot of trying left to do.

And, Madame President, from last week I’ve concluded we have much to learn from each other – and much to teach the rest of the world. 

So, let us rededicate ourselves, 50 years after Bobby Kennedy’s speech gave hope to South Africa and the world, to facing these challenges together.

Thank you, Madame President. I yield the floor.

###

 

Delaware Delegation applauds passage of historic chemical safety reform legislation

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senators Tom Carper and Chris Coons (both D-Del.), and Congressman John Carney (D-Del.) applauded Senate passage of legislation to reform the decades-old Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA). In May, the bill passed the House of Representatives with overwhelming support, and is expected to receive the President’s signature in the coming weeks.

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, based on a bill authored by the late -Senator Lautenberg (D-N.J.) a longtime champion of TSCA reform, overhauls the 40-year-old law that regulates thousands of chemicals used in products Americans rely on every day. This new law requires chemicals to meet safety standards before they can enter the market while providing businesses with a predictable and manageable review process to ensure chemicals are deemed safe for commercial use.

“I am incredibly proud that Congress has finally sent President Obama a bipartisan compromise that will reform our broken chemical safety laws,” said Senator Tom Carper. “Over the past forty years, our country’s outdated and inadequate chemical safety laws have put the public at risk for toxic exposure, and left businesses in Delaware and across the country with a broken regulatory process that undermines innovation. Reaching this historic achievement to overhaul our country’s toxics law was possible only because both sides of the aisle and both chambers of Congress have worked together to compromise on policy without ever compromising our principles. I thank Senators Udall and Vitter and Chairman Inhofe for working tirelessly for years to make this bipartisan solution possible.”

“The widespread support for this bill is a testament to the urgent need to update our chemical safety laws to adequately protect our communities, protect our environment, and support industries who have been calling for clearer safety standards for decades,” said Senator Chris Coons. “As home to some of America’s leading chemical manufacturers, Delaware knows firsthand how detrimental our outdated chemical safety laws are on communities and businesses. We now have a bill that will finally ensure Delaware and the country has a regulatory framework that works for the 21st century by protecting human health and the environment, while also providing certainty and predictability for consumers and industry. This bill proves that Congress can still come together to work for the American people.”

“Passing TSCA is a big win for Delaware consumers and Delaware businesses,” said Congressman Carney. “This legislation will provide clarity to the many innovative companies we’re home to and improve safety standards for products in households around the country. I’m proud of the bipartisan effort behind this bill — it shows what we can accomplish when we’re willing to put partisanship aside and come together.”

Senators Carper and Coons worked closely with the bill’s authors in the Senate, Senators Tom Udall (D-N.M.) and David Vitter (R-La.) for more than a year, leading a group of Democratic colleagues in discussions to secure enhanced protections for public health and the environment, including provisions that would protect children, pregnant women, and workers from toxic risks, ensure EPA has access to information to assess safety risks, and allow states to enforce federal toxic safety. They joined the Senate legislation as cosponsors of the compromise proposal, introduced in March 2015. On the House side, Congressman Carney worked with his colleagues to help facilitate passage and ensure the bill reflected the priorities of Delaware’s consumers and businesses. Since its introduction, the Delegation has worked hard to further improve the bill and are proud of the strong bipartisan process that has moved this legislation forward with broad support from both sides of the aisle. 

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act is supported by organizations including Environmental Defense Fund, American Chemistry Council, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, American Association for Justice, and March of Dimes.

The Week Ahead for Senator Chris Coons

Monday, June 6 at 8:30 a.m. – The Senator will join the delegation in meeting with the West Side Grows Together steering committee. West Side Grows Together, a coalition of Wilmington’s West Side residents, businesses, churches and community groups who are working together to make their neighborhoods the best they can be. The committee will update the delegation on the past years’ successes as well as their plans for the coming year. Westside Family Healthcare, 1801 West Fourth Street, Wilmington, DE.

Tuesday, June 7 at 5 p.m. — Sens. Coons and Whitehouse (D-RI) will deliver a colloquy on the Senate floor detailing recent findings from their trip through Delaware’s climate change impacted areas. The visit, which took place on Saturday, May 21, included stops in Wilmington’s South Bridge neighborhood, where they visited a neighborhood impacted by climate change and how DNREC is working with neighbors to find a solution, a visit to Prime Hook beach to see recent work rebuilding the beach area, and to Cape Henlopen to take part in a citizen science project counting horseshoe crabs. Senate Floor, Washington, D.C.

Tuesday, June 7 at 5:30 p.m. — The Senator will speak on the Senate floor about America’s ongoing efforts to enforce the terms of the nuclear deal with Iran and highlight the importance of pushing back on Iran’s provocative behavior. Open to press. Senate Floor, Washington, D.C.

Wednesday, June 8 at 10:30 a.m. — The Senator will attend a Joint Meeting of Congress with the Prime Minister of India Narendra Damodardas Modi. Prime Minister Modi will become the fifth Indian prime minister to address the U.S. Congress. United States House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.

Wednesday, June 8 at 2:30 p.m. — The Senator will deliver remarks with Reps. Diane Black (TN-6), Peter Welch (VT-AL), and Chris Collins (NY-27) briefing on advanced directives. The briefing will focus on their bill, the Medicare Choices Empowerment and Protection Act. Open to press. G-11 Dirsken Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C.

Wednesday, June 8 at 4:45 p.m. — The Senator will host a reception for students who were selected and have accepted appointments to United States service academies. Open to press. Senate Visitors Center Room 212. Washington, D.C.

Thursday, June 9 at 9 a.m. — The Senator is honorary co-host and will deliver remarks at the “Trends in Global Food Security: Findings from the 2016 Global Food Security Index.” Sen. Coons will join DuPont, the Alliance to End Hunger and The Economist Intelligence Unit for the briefing. Open to press. 325 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C.

Friday, June 10 at 10:30 a.m. – The Senator will join the celebration for the grand opening of SODEL Concepts’ new restaurant Matt’s Fish Camp, named after Matt Haley. Sen. Coons will assist in the kitchen to prep for the lunch rush and speak with employees. Open to press. 28635 Coastal Hwy, Bethany Beach, DE.

Friday, June 10 at 12:30 p.m. — The Senator will deliver remarks at the Delaware State Trial Lawyers Association annual awards luncheon. co-host and deliver remarks at the DuPont global food security briefing. Open to press. Atlantic Sands Hotel, Rehoboth Beach, DE.

Senator Coons praises Obama Administration’s action to ban commercial trade of African elephant ivory in U.S.

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, today applauded the Obama Administration’s decision to institute a near-total ban on the domestic commercial trade of African elephant ivory. The rule, which fulfills restrictions outlined under President Obama’s 2013 Executive Order on Combating Wildlife Trafficking, substantially limits imports, exports, and sales of African elephant ivory across state lines.

“Wildlife poaching and trafficking is a global crisis that threatens international security, and even legal trade in ivory can contribute to elephant poaching,” said Senator Coons. “Reducing demand for ivory here in the United States is key in combating wildlife trafficking, which is why it is so important that the Fish and Wildlife Service is taking action to significantly reduce commercial ivory trade. I applaud the Obama Administration’s actions and will continue to work with my colleagues in Congress to support this important effort through the legislative process.”

Senator Coons and Senator Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) introduced the END Wildlife Trafficking Act last year to combat the rapidly growing crisis of wildlife trafficking by facilitating a strategic interagency approach, with a focus on country-specific and regional initiatives. The bill supports the ongoing work of the Presidential Task Force on Combating Wildlife Trafficking and directs the Task Force to analyze threats to wildlife and cooperatively develop country-specific strategic plans to combat those threats. The bill recently passed out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee with unanimous support.

ICYMI: Senators Coons, King, Portman op-ed in TIME: “The Secret Tax That Targets Families Affected By Death or Disability”

WASHINGTON – In case you missed it, U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.), Angus King (I-Maine), and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) yesterday published an op-ed in TIME about the Stop Taxing Death and Disability Act. The bill, which the Senators recently introduced, would eliminate an unfair and unjust tax penalty levied on student loans forgiven for families after the death of their child and Americans who develop permanent disabilities.

TIME: The Secret Tax That Targets Families Affected By Death or Disability

By Rob Portman, Angus King, and Chris Coons

The grief and pain of losing of a child is unimaginable. The strength and durability of character of those forced to pick up the pieces in the months and years following such a loss is an inspiration. We believe it’s our responsibility as lawmakers to do everything we can to support families in these situations.

This commitment to making difficult days a little easier is why the federal government forgives student loan debt for families of children who have died or Americans who have become permanently disabled. This same commitment should extend to the tax burden that comes with that loan forgiveness.

The U.S. Department of Education forgives student loans for individuals because of death or total and permanent disability. This is a sensible, compassionate policy. However, these Americans who suffer great personal loss or severe injury are often shocked to learn that through an unfortunate quirk in current law, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may require them to pay income tax on the very loans the Department of Education has forgiven. A one-time discharge of loans can result in tens of thousands of dollars in immediate tax liability.

Under current law, the IRS treats the amount of student loans forgiven as income, which must be reported on an individual’s tax return. Borrowers are given the colorfully-named Form 1099C and instructed to report these discharged loans as a type of income, which is subject to tax. Instead of helping families heal, this misguided policy simply replaces one financial burden with another.

The consequences are real. Take the Maine couple who had to pay $24,000 in taxes on forgiven loans after their son died suddenly from a brain aneurysm. Or the permanently disabled Ohio woman who had to scramble to find $14,000 to cover tax on her discharged loans. Or the Delawarean who had more than $30,000 of student loans discharged following a permanent disability, only to learn that he might be subject to a significant tax.

We see examples of this all over the country—sometimes even in our own offices. A member of Senator Coons’ staff and his family experienced this harrowing situation after his older brother passed away in 2009. When his brother died at age 23, six months after graduating from college, his parents were liable for his brother’s student loans.

Reeling from the loss of a child, it took years of miscommunication and negotiations with their loan servicers for his parents to finally have the loans forgiven in 2015. This year, they were surprised to receive a notice stating that the $75,000 in loan forgiveness should be declared as income on their tax return, which could result in tens of thousands of dollars in taxes owed to the IRS.

We believe that stories like these should be, at worst, nothing more than a bad dream—not living nightmares for American families. To end this, we—Republicans, Democrats and Independents from across the U.S.—worked together to introduce a bill in both the House and Senate to fix this problem. Our bipartisan proposal, the Stop Taxing Death and Disability Act, is simple—it eliminates this unfair tax on forgiven loans, because it serves no public policy purpose.

Under current law, student loans belonging to a borrower whose college closes, or for individuals who work in certain public service fields, already have their loans forgiven tax-free. Why should student loans forgiven for death or disability be treated any differently?

Since we introduced this bill, we have been gratified by the groundswell of support it has received. The Stop Taxing Death and Disability Act has been endorsed by more than 25 groups within the disability, education and veterans’ communities, including the American Legion, the Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation, the National Down Syndrome Congress and Student Veterans for America.

But we need to work faster. The Department of Education has just identified nearly 400,000 Americans with total and permanent disabilities who are eligible for discharge of their federal student loans. However, many of these individuals could face this same surprise tax bill following their loan forgiveness. That’s why it is critical that Congress pass the Stop Taxing Death and Disability Act to help give grieving families closure after their loans are discharged.

Despite our divided political climate, we have a rare opportunity to turn this commonsense, bipartisan bill into law. If you, like us, agree that taxing death and disability is an insensitive and useless policy, join us by spreading the word that time is running out. With the latest Department of Education announcement, thousands more families may face the consequences of this absurd tax. Let’s take action to end this tax and make this misguided policy nothing more than what it should be— a bad dream.

Senators Introduce Student Tax Relief Act

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) today was joined by Senators Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Jack Reed (D-RI), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Gary Peters (D-MI), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) in introducing the Student Tax Relief Act, a bill that would protect defrauded student borrowers from being taxed on their forgiven loans. This legislation follows actions by the Department of Education to protect defrauded students at 100 Corinthian Colleges across the country and ensures that borrowers at any schools whose loans were forgiven receive the same tax relief. 

“Figuring out which college to go to and how to pay for it is hard enough without being subjected to false advertising from higher ed institutions,” said Senator Coons. “Forgiving the loans of students who are victims of fraudulent institutions is the right thing to do, but requiring them to pay a hefty tax on that forgiven loan still leaves many of these students struggling to make ends meet and afford continuing their education. We should be doing everything we can to help students afford the college that fits their needs, not making it harder.”

The Senators joined their colleagues in sending a letter to Department of Education Secretary John King in April and President Obama in March calling on the Administration to provide fair debt relief to victims of unlawful or deceptive practices in higher education through a tough borrower defense rule.  More information on the decision by the Department of Education to discharge loans of defrauded students may be found here and the full list of the schools eligible for a loan discharge may be found here

VIDEO: Sen. Coons, author of “What to Expect When You’re Expecting” push for Zika funding

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) led Heidi Murkoff, the internationally-known author of “What to Expect When You’re Expecting,” and several of his Senate colleagues to call on the House of Representatives and Republicans in the Senate to quickly move forward a bipartisan measure to provide $1.1 billion in emergency funding to help the United States prepare for the spread of the Zika virus.  The event came only days before Memorial Day Weekend, the official start of both the summer and mosquito seasons. The CDC recently announced that it is monitoring nearly 300 pregnant women in the United States and territories for possible Zika infections, meaning they could be at risk of delivering babies with microcephaly and other birth defects. 

Just yesterday, Senate Republicans stopped funding for Zika from moving forward by objecting to taking up the Senate-passed $1.1 billion compromise as an amendment to the House-passed Zika bill. Simply amending the House bill would enable Congress to quickly get this emergency funding passed; as it stands, the Senate must wait for the House to finish an unrelated appropriations bill in order for the Zika funds to go to a conference committee, an endeavor that has no end in sight. 

“We’re here today to talk about an issue that is really as simple as it gets.  There is a virus in Central America that has been spreading northward and that has devastating impacts for women and especially for newborn babies.  We know it’s coming to our country and as the weather’s getting warmer, our nation’s top medical experts say we must pass funding on an emergency basis to make sure that we are ready and that we are responding,” said Senator Coons.  “These doctors aren’t Democrats, they’re not Republicans – they’re doctors – and they know how to deal with viruses, and they know how to keep our families and our country safe.  So, along with the wonderful people who are here with us today, I find it extremely difficult to understand how we could just ignore the advice of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) and our best medical experts.  Unfortunately, though, that’s what we’re dealing with here in the Senate as we go into Memorial Day, which is the official start of summer and the start of mosquito season, Congressional Republicans are simply refusing to deal with a virus that we know is spreading and spreading rapidly.”

“There is no better investment in our future than healthy beginnings for every mom and every baby. And the Zika virus threatens those healthy beginnings and our collective future,” said Heidi Murkoff, author of What to Expect When You’re Expecting

“We stand with the thousands of moms, dads, and expectant parents across the country who have raised their voices in support of emergency funding to combat, treat and prevent the Zika virus,” said Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner, Executive Director and CEO of MomsRising.org. “Millions of pregnant women and women of childbearing age could potentially be affected by Zika if we don’t act now. Congress must pass this necessary funding immediately – without it, quite frankly, we are unprepared for a known health crisis.”

Coons, Hatch, Heller Introduce Bipartisan International Communications Privacy Act

Washington, D.C.—Today Senators Chris Coons, D-Del., Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Dean Heller, R-Nev. introduced the International Communications Privacy Act—a bipartisan bill that will clarify U.S. law enforcement’s ability to obtain electronic communications around the world.

“In an increasingly globalized world, protecting data stored abroad is critical to our country’s ability to compete in the global economy,” said Senator Coons. “Just like law enforcement agencies should be required to get a warrant before accessing the content of Americans’ communications within our borders, processes for accessing content located abroad should also comply with the law.  This common-sense bill will protect our data across borders, and encourage fair treatment by our international partners.”

“It is past time for Congress to modernize the outdated Electronic Communications Privacy Act,” Senator Hatch said. “As we do so, lawmakers must not ignore the pressing issue of international data privacy and the need for Congress to establish a legal framework for accessing extraterritorial communications. The global reach of government warrant authority has significant implications for multinational businesses and their customers. The International Communications Privacy Act aids law enforcement while safeguarding consumer privacy, striking a much-needed balance in today’s data-driven economy.” 

“The world is becoming more dependent on broadband internet by the minute,” Senator Heller said. “As this technological necessity continues to expand its role in our society, it is imperative the guaranteed rights of law-abiding citizens are balanced against the ability for law enforcement to do its job. I’m proud to join Senators Hatch and Coons to achieve this goal.”

Background 

The International Communications Privacy Act (ICPA) creates a legal framework that clarifies the ability of law enforcement to obtain electronic communication of U.S. citizens, no matter where the person or the communications are located. It also provides for law enforcement to obtain communications of foreign citizens in limited circumstances, consistent with international law. 

ICPA Overview –

  • Requires law enforcement agencies to obtain a warrant for all content. Under ICPA, law enforcement may only obtain the content of electronic communications stored with electronic communication service providers and remote computing service providers pursuant to a warrant.
  • Creates a clear legal framework authorizing law enforcement to obtain the electronic communications of U.S. persons, regardless of where those communications are located. It also allows law enforcement to obtain electronic communications relating to foreign nationals in certain circumstances.
  • Reforms the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) process by providing greater accessibility, transparency, and accountability. ICPA requires the Attorney General to create an online docketing system for MLAT requests and to publish new statistics on the number of such requests.
  • Establishes a sense of Congress that data providers should not be subject to data localization requirements. Such requirements are incompatible with the borderless nature of the Internet, an impediment to online innovation, and unnecessary to meet the needs of law enforcement.