Related Issues

Related Issues

ICYMI: Baltimore Sun profiles Sen. Coons’ bill to end tax penalty on loan forgiveness for families suffering from death of child

WASHINGTON – In case you missed it, The Baltimore Sun profiled U.S. Senator Chris Coons’ (D-Del.) legislation to eliminate a tax penalty levied on student loans forgiven for families after the death of their child and Americans who develop permanent disabilities.

Full article below:

Baltimore Sun: Family grieving son’s loss hit with large tax bill

By John Fritze

Andrew Wall was just months out of college and working on a farm in Hawaii when he collapsed. It was the first sign of the brain tumor that would claim his life days after his 23rd birthday.

The rugby-playing English major from Annapolis left behind a shocked and grieving family. Understandably, his relatives weren’t focused on the financial implications of his death.

It wasn’t until years later that the tax bill arrived.

The U.S. Department of Education and private lenders might write off student loans when a borrower dies or becomes severely disabled. But a quirk in federal law requires the Internal Revenue Service to treat the forgiven debt as taxable income.

The Wall family suddenly found themselves on the hook for as much as tens of thousands of dollars.

“You go from owing money to a provider that has a whole system in place to pay over a period of time to, all of a sudden, you owe a flat fee to the IRS,” said Eric Wall, Andrew’s younger brother. “This was the last thing on my parents’ minds.”

Andrew Wall, who graduated from Annapolis High School in 2005, had about $75,000 in outstanding students loans from his education at Mount St. Mary’s University in Emmitsburg. Eric Wall said his parents are still negotiating the amount of tax they will owe.

The federal government forgave some 55,000 student loans worth a total of $1.3 billion in 2012, the most recent year for which data is available, but the number of families eligible for forgiveness is likely to be much higher. Relying on Social Security Administration data, the Department of Education recently identified about 387,000 disabled borrowers who officials believe might qualify to have their loans forgiven.

Those borrowers had more than $7.7 billion in outstanding debt.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers is backing legislation to remove forgiven student loan debt from a co-signer’s gross income in cases of death or severe disability.

Eric Wall works for Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, one of the lead sponsors of the bill. But he learned of his own family’s struggles with the issue only after the legislation crossed his desk.

Andrew Wall, who was athletic and enjoyed the outdoors, also loved literature — and could often be found reading or writing, his brother said. He planned to join AmeriCorps and become a teacher, but he decided to spend the summer after his graduation on an organic farm in Hawaii. It was on that farm that he collapsed.

“When we started looking at the profile of the kinds of families this affected, I thought, ‘Wait a second,'” said Wall, a 26-year-old legislative correspondent in Coons’ office.

He called his parents to ask if they had received any mail that looked like tax paperwork and, sure enough, they found a form similar to a W-2 that had arrived months earlier.

“They were totally blindsided,” he said.

How much money the Treasury Department is collecting from the tax is not clear. An IRS spokesman could not provide a figure because the revenue is not easily separated from other, similar types of tax within the same category.

The agency declined to comment on the legislative effort.

Several advocates said the impact on revenue might be limited because, they believe, the IRS is not enforcing the liability as aggressively as other taxes.

Coons said that should not be an excuse for stalling on changing the tax code. An unknown number of families, he said, are following the letter of the law by paying the tax.

“When I heard that it struck me, frankly, as even worse,” the Democrat said in an interview.

“The more we dug into the fact pattern,” Coons said, “the more it became clear that this affects hundreds of thousands of people. The scale of it is actually pretty large.”

Nora Brennen, a Maine woman whose son died of an aneurysm in 2012, said she did not feel the IRS treated her family leniently. She remembers an IRS customer service representative suggesting she sell her deceased son’s personal belongings to help pay the $27,000 in federal taxes the family wound up owning on a forgiven student loan.

Her son, Keegan, died months after graduating from the New Hampshire Institute of Art.

“I’m crying because I’m still grieving, and he’s quoting me the section we fall under in the tax code that’s the same as a farmer who forecloses on his farm — who can sell old tires, and tractors” to pay off the tax liability, Brennen said.

“He’s giving me a lesson in how this tax works, and I’m like, ‘You’re kidding me, right?'”

Brennen, who kept her son’s belongings, now writes a $435 check every month to the federal government.

The issue also affects families whose children die while serving in the military, several advocates said. Derek Fronabarger, with the Washington-based Student Veterans of America, said his group is familiar with at least one case of a family being saddled with the post-loan debt.

The organization supports the legislation.

“At the time of a family’s grief, it’s definitely unconscionable to even think about sending them a bill,” Fronabarger said.

The legislation has influential Republican supporters, including Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio, a member of the Senate Finance Committee. It doesn’t appear to have any vocal opposition.

“These families have been through enough already, and the last thing they need is a massive tax bill,” Portman said in a statement. “They did nothing wrong, and we have to fix this.”

Coons said he hopes the bill will advance without controversy this year, or become part of a broader series of tax cut-outs and adjustments Congress historically approves without drama.

There is little reason the measure should not be popular with Republicans — it is, after all, a tax cut — but supporters are unable to say exactly how much it would cost in lost revenue.

That uncertainty raises the significance of the bill’s score — the formal cost estimate determined by the Joint Committee on Taxation — expected later this year.

Rep. Peter Roskam, an Illinois Republican and a member of the Ways and Means Committee, is the lead sponsor of the bill in the GOP-controlled House. A spokesman, David Pasch, said supporters don’t believe the lost revenue will be significant.

“Any cost associated with this bill is because we are currently taxing the families of dead and permanently disabled students,” Pasch said. “This issue is just so inherently wrong that [Roskam] felt it his obligation to help correct it.”

john.fritze@baltsun.com

Senator Coons, colleagues encourage CFPB to strengthen proposed small-dollar lending rules

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, 28 U.S. Senators—led by Senators Chris Coons (D-DE), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Dick Durbin (D-IL), and Sherrod Brown (D-OH) — wrote to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) expressing support for the agency’s small-dollar lending rule and encouraging the consumer agency to strengthen consumer protections in the proposed rule before finalizing it.

“[W]e encourage the CFPB to strengthen certain protections in the proposed rule to ensure the strongest possible defense against the predatory lending models that trap consumers in unaffordable and escalating cycles of debt,” the Senators wrote. “Research shows that small-dollar loans with excessive interest rates often drag consumers into a cycle of debt that is not sustainable… For most Americans, these high-cost loans are unaffordable with one in five borrowers eventually defaulting.”

Specifically, the Senators pressed the CFPB to strengthen provisions of the proposed rule that create exemptions from proving the customer’s ability to repay, and that shorten the “cooling-off” period between loans from 60 to 30 days. They wrote:

“[W]e are concerned the proposed rule allows for some exemptions from the ability to repay analysis as outlined in the proposal. For example, the proposal allows lenders to make six loans to a single borrower without determining their ability to repay, so long as certain disclosures are made and borrowing history conditions are met. The proposal also includes exemptions from the full ability to repay analysis for certain problematic long-term loans, which may include high origination fees. We urge the CFPB to reconsider the six loan exemption and implement strong ability to repay requirements. We also encourage you to strengthen the analysis that lenders must undertake to ensure that borrowers have enough money to pay all basic living expenses.

“Additionally, we are concerned about the reduced cooling off, or waiting, period between loans from 60 days in the CFPB’s preliminary proposal to 30 days in the proposed rule. As noted above, the CFPB’s research found that 80% of payday loans are rolled over or followed by another loan within 14 days. By reducing the cooling off period, the CFPB’s protection against repeated borrowing is substantially weakened. We urge the CFPB to ensure that a cooling off period is long enough that borrowers can manage their expenses and are not reborrowing to service prior short-term loans.”

In addition to Merkley, Durbin, Brown and Coons, the letter was signed by Senators Jack Reed (D-RI), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Al Franken (D-MN), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Patty Murray (D-WA), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Tom Udall (D-NM), Bob Casey (D-PA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Ben Cardin (D-MD), Chris Murphy (D-CT), and Charles E. Schumer (D-NY).

The full text of the letter follows below.

Dear Director Cordray,

We write to express our support for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) proposed rule to address payday lending practices. We believe that the CFPB’s efforts will help to rein in damaging payday loans, and are pleased that the proposal also applies to abusive vehicle title loans, deposit advance products, and certain high-cost installment loans and open-end loans. However, we encourage the CFPB to strengthen certain protections in the proposed rule to ensure the strongest possible defense against the predatory lending models that trap consumers in unaffordable and escalating cycles of debt.

Research shows that small-dollar loans with excessive interest rates often drag consumers into a cycle of debt that is not sustainable. Many payday loans can carry annual interest rates of 300% or higher along with fees that exceed the amount borrowed, making it virtually impossible for any American living paycheck to paycheck to fully pay off the associated principal, interest, and fees to retire their debt. The ability of a payday lender to access a borrower’s bank account and rack up overdraft fees adds to the already vicious cycle and exorbitant costs of payday loans.

For most Americans, these high-cost loans are unaffordable with one in five borrowers eventually defaulting. The cycle begins when those borrowers unable to make their payments are forced to return to the payday lender and borrow more to pay off their previous loan. According to CFPB’s own research, 80% of payday loans are rolled over or renewed and the majority of payday loans are made to borrowers who renew their loans so many times that they pay more in fees than the amount of money they borrowed.1 As described, payday loans are unaffordable by design. Three-quarters of payday loan fees are generated by consumers who take out ten or more payday loans a year.2

We are encouraged to see the CFPB’s proposed rule tackle the unaffordability of these loans by requiring lenders to evaluate a consumer’s ability to repay. By establishing an ability to repay standard in payday lending, including an assessment of both income and expenses, the CFPB is taking a critical step toward ensuring that payday lenders originate affordable loans. We were also pleased to see the CFPB reaffirm the importance of strong state laws on payday lending that include consumer protections.

However, we are concerned the proposed rule allows for some exemptions from the ability to repay analysis as outlined in the proposal. For example, the proposal allows lenders to make six loans to a single borrower without determining their ability to repay, so long as certain disclosures are made and borrowing history conditions are met. The proposal also includes exemptions from the full ability to repay analysis for certain problematic long-term loans, which may include high origination fees. We urge the CFPB to reconsider the six loan exemption and implement strong ability to repay requirements. We also encourage you to strengthen the analysis that lenders must undertake to ensure that borrowers have enough money to pay all basic living expenses.

Additionally, we are concerned about the reduced cooling off, or waiting, period between loans from 60 days in the CFPB’s preliminary proposal to 30 days in the proposed rule. As noted above, the CFPB’s research found that 80% of payday loans are rolled over or followed by another loan within 14 days.3 By reducing the cooling off period, the CFPB’s protection against repeated borrowing is substantially weakened. We urge the CFPB to ensure that a cooling off period is long enough that borrowers can manage their expenses and are not reborrowing to service prior short-term loans.

Overall, we commend the CFPB for taking action against one of the most destructive financial products in the market. We hope the CFPB will take this opportunity to strengthen the proposed rule, affirm strong existing requirements under state law, and end the payday debt trap, ensuring that hardworking Americans are able to responsibly manage their finances.

Sincerely,

[1] United States, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Press Release “CFPB Finds Four Out Of Five Payday Loans Are Rolled Over Or Renewed,” March 25, 2014. Available at:http://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/cfpb-finds-four-out-of-five-payday-loans-are-rolled-over-or-renewed/

2 United States, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “Payday Loans and Deposit Advance Products, White Paper of Initial Data Findings,” April 24, 2013, pg 22. Available at:http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201304_cfpb_payday-dap-whitepaper.pdf

3 United States, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The CFPB Office of Research “CFPB Data Point: Payday Lending,” March 25, 2014, pg 4. Available at:http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201403_cfpb_report_payday-lending.pdf

Senators Coons, Roberts, Schumer urge IRS to help startups, small businesses access critical R&D credit

WASHINGTON – This week, U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.), Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) and Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Treasury Department to encourage the IRS to issue guidance to help startups and small businesses access the research and development (R&D) tax credit.  At the end of 2015, Congress passed tax legislation that not only made the R&D credit permanent, but also expanded the credit to allow startups and small businesses to access it.  The idea to expand the credit to startups was drawn from the Innovators Job Creation Act, a bill Senator Coons introduced with Senators Roberts and Schumer.

“While the legislation sets the framework for ensuring that startups and small businesses can benefit from the R&D tax credit, getting the administrative details right is essential to ensuring that the policy goals of Congress are realized,” the Senators wrote.  “In particular, we view it as vital that Treasury and the IRS use common sense in administering the startup provisions of the R&D tax credit, reflecting the real world of entrepreneurs and new businesses.”

In addition to urging the IRS to issue guidance, the letter also asks the IRS to interpret statute in a way that allows the most startups and small businesses to benefit from the critical R&D credit.  Finally, the letter encourages the IRS to partner with the Small Business Administration to educate the small business community about their potential eligibility for the R&D credit.

Senator Coons is a member of the Small Business Committee and the Ranking Member on the Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee on Appropriations, which oversees funding for the IRS. Coons is a strong advocate for policies to encourage innovation and has long been a champion of the R&D tax credit as a key incentive for investment in advanced research.  Details about his work on the R&D tax credit can be found on his website here.  

The full text of the letter is below.

Dear Commissioner Koskinen and Assistant Secretary Mazur:

We write to encourage the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to carefully issue guidance to ensure smooth and effective implementation of the R&D credits for startup companies and small businesses that were included in the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act (PATH Act). We were the key sponsors of these provisions in the PATH Act, which were drawn from our Innovators Job Creation Act (S. 455).  This newly expanded credit has the potential to greatly assist new innovative businesses.  

While the legislation sets the framework for ensuring that startups and small businesses can benefit from the R&D tax credit, getting the administrative details right is essential to ensuring that the policy goals of Congress are realized.  In particular, we view it as vital that Treasury and IRS use common sense in administering the startup provisions of the R&D tax credit, reflecting the real world of entrepreneurs and new businesses. 

Specifically, we encourage the IRS to carefully evaluate the definition of gross receipts, so that deserving startups and small businesses are able to access the benefits of the R&D credit.  It is particularly important that startups are not excluded from the credit due to their receipt of government or nonprofit grants, a common source of support for many innovative companies.  Also, we want to ensure that record keeping requirements remain consistent with the intent of the bill.  The statute specifically provides statutory guidance that Treasury should issue “regulations to minimize compliance and recordkeeping burdens” for the startup.  We do not want entrepreneurs to spend significant time and money filling out unreasonable paperwork for the IRS.

Separate from guidance, we believe that a critical part of making these new provisions a success is to ensure that companies are educated about their potential eligibility for the newly expanded R&D tax credit in the PATH Act.  With that goal in mind, we strongly encourage Treasury and the IRS to conduct meaningful outreach to educate small and medium businesses as well as startups about the expansion of the R&D tax credit included in the PATH Act.  The Small Business Administration will be an important partner in this effort.

We appreciate your attention to this important matter.  We look forward to receiving your comments, guidance, and any plans you may have to educate small business owners about the new provisions of the R&D credit.

Sincerely,

Senate unanimously approves Sen. Coons’ bill to streamline federal housing programs, expand affordable housing

WILMINGTON – Yesterday, the Senate unanimously passed the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act, which streamlines and reforms a number of federal affordable housing programs.  The bill is the House companion to a Senate bill that Senator Coons introduced along with Senators Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and Roy Blunt (R-Mo.).  

“I applaud my colleagues in the Senate for their unanimous approval of this critical update to our affordable housing programs, “ said Senator Coons.  “I’ve heard from dozens of housing authorities, tenant advocacy groups, and housing professionals in Delaware about the pressing need for these updates to improve our approach to affordable housing. I was proud to work with Senators Menendez, Scott, and Blunt to champion this legislation in the Senate and ultimately help get this bill over the finish line.”

The Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act makes a number of critical reforms to our housing laws. Specifically, the bill streamlines Section 8 rental assistance programs to relieve regulatory burden on providers of public housing; allows providers to use more funding to renovate housing units; and encourages employment by delaying rent increases for families who experience a rise in earned income.  The bill also improves housing programs to prevent homelessness, bolsters the Department of Agriculture’s rural housing programs, and updates housing assistance programs for individuals with HIV/AIDS. 

Senator Coons has long been an advocate for housing assistance programs run by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).  During his time in New Castle County government, he helped oversee HUD Section 8 rental assistance programs, as well as HUD affordable housing grant programs, including the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) and the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG).  As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, he has fought for funding for HOME, CDBG, Section 8, and other HUD programs that impact Delaware.

 

Senator Coons’ statement on passage of bill to combat opioid epidemic

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) released the following statement after the bipartisan Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA) passed the Senate last night. Senator Coons is an original co-sponsor of CARA. The President is expected to sign this bill into law in the coming weeks. 

“Delaware has been facing a devastating crisis of deaths due to heroin and opioid drug overdoses that has left no part of the country unscathed,” said Senator Coons. “The real tragedy of this epidemic is that it is preventable with the right programs and resources.  The Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act provides us with a path forward for strengthening the federal role in providing resources for evidence-based drug treatment and prevention programs, as well as combatting the over-prescription of opioids and other prescription medications, one of the biggest drivers of this crisis. The bill lays out a framework for federal, state, and local law enforcement, health care, and treatment centers to work together to tackle this serious challenge to public health in our country.

“While this bill is an important step forward in combatting this national crisis, it does not include the resources necessary to follow through on its promise of ensuring Americans suffering from addiction can access the help they need. That’s why I have joined my colleagues in urging Senator McConnell to bring up measures to devote funding to the crisis. I will continue working with my colleagues to provide the funding required to address this epidemic head on.”

Senator Coons on the one-year anniversary of the Iran nuclear deal: “If this agreement is to succeed, Congressional oversight will remain absolutely critical”

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, issued the following statement on the one-year anniversary of last summer’s nuclear agreement with Iran:

“One year ago, the international community reached an agreement to further one of America’s most important foreign policy priorities: preventing Iran from developing or obtaining a nuclear weapon. The nuclear deal has so far done what it was intended to do. But in the months and years to come, those of us determined to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran have a responsibility to undertake consistent, clear-eyed assessments of how the agreement fares. That means acknowledging both its successes and its shortcomings.

“Iran’s compliance with the nuclear deal has not reflected a change in the regime’s provocative behavior outside the scope of the agreement. Iran continues to conduct illegal ballistic missile tests, support terrorism throughout the Middle East, and violate the human rights of its people, its neighbors, and visitors. We must remind this administration and future administrations – and the world – of the threat posed by Iran and its nuclear ambitions, deal or no deal. That’s why our oversight and enforcement of the nuclear agreement must be relentless, and our opposition to Iran’s dangerous actions vigorous. Congress must work together to strengthen the administration’s ability to push back on Iran’s behavior outside the deal. 

“While pursuing international engagement and multilateral diplomacy, we must always maintain a credible conventional military deterrent to protect American interests and our partners in the Middle East, especially our vital ally, Israel. On all fronts, if this agreement is to succeed in preventing a nuclear-armed Iran, Congressional oversight will remain absolutely critical. I intend to uphold my commitment to scrutinizing enforcement of this nuclear deal and pushing back on Iran’s dangerous behavior as long as I have the privilege to represent the people of Delaware.”

Senator Coons introduces resolution to celebrate value of trademarks

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.), co-chair of the Congressional Trademark Caucus and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, yesterday introduced a resolution designating July as the “National Anti-Counterfeiting Consumer Education and Awareness” Month, in celebration of the 70th anniversary of the Lanham Act, which laid the foundation for a modern federal trademark registration system. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the co-chair of the Congressional Trademark Caucus, also co-sponsored this resolution.

 

“Not only are trademarks critical for companies’ ability to grow and create jobs, but they also play an important role in communicating the authenticity and integrity of products and services to customers,” said Senator Coons.  “Counterfeit products can put consumers’ health at risk.  For example, counterfeit batteries, sometimes featuring fake trademarks, have been linked to increased risks of spontaneous fires—a clear safety hazard if that battery is in a consumer product such as a children’s toy. By designating this month the ‘National Anti-Counterfeiting Consumer Education and Awareness’ Month, I hope to foster greater consumer awareness of this problem and the role that intellectual property—here, the trademark system—plays in protecting consumers. I am pleased to have co-sponsored this legislation with Chairman Chuck Grassley, co-chair of the Congressional Trademark Caucus, as a bipartisan show of support for the intellectual property infrastructure necessary to support our nation’s dynamic economy.”

 

[VIDEO] Senator Coons: “Science should not be a partisan issue. And neither, frankly, should climate change”

WASHINGTON – Yesterday, U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) joined his colleagues on the Senate floor to call out the Koch brothers and fossil fuel industry-funded groups that have fashioned a web of denial to block action on climate change. Senator Coons discussed the so-called Advancement of Sound Science Center (TASSC), one of several front groups that played an instrumental role in obscuring the facts around health risks of smoking and the dangers posed by climate change. 

Full audio and video of Senator Coons’ speech available here: http://bit.ly/29tCMjC

 

Excerpts from Senator Coons’ remarks: 

It is troubling that today, in the 21st century, there is any doubt about the importance of real, sound science to many facets of our lives. It is troubling that we still need to defend science here on the Senate floor.

Never have we had a greater ability to collect and analyze data than today. That’s why, more than ever, in today’s world, science should drive policy, not the other way around.

There are far too many organizations in existence today that have it backwards. These organizations have attempted to distort science for purely political ends because the facts threaten the bottom line of those who have created and sustained them.  

Existence of groups like TASSC…make clear that we must work even harder to defend and support science throughout our society.

Science should not be a partisan issue.  And neither, frankly, should climate change.

The challenges of climate change are daunting and urgent, and so we should be focused on using the best science available to tackle these challenges with the best policy solutions possible

Senator Coons’ full remarks below: 

Madam President, I’d like to thank my great colleague, the Senator from Rhode Island for his tireless efforts to keep climate change on this chamber’s radar. One day, I hope we can move it from our radar to our to-do list and, ultimately, the history books. 

Today, I’m pleased and proud to join my colleagues here to talk about something I thought we’d established in grade school, but apparently bears repeating: that is, the importance of science. 

It is troubling that today, in the 21st century, there is any doubt about the importance of real, sound science to many facets of our lives. It is troubling that we still need to defend science here on the Senate floor. 

Scientific discovery and invention is the engine of our economy. Science leads to transformative technologies and new ways of thinking in a wide range of fields: healthcare, manufacturing, agriculture, clean energy and national security.

Scientific inquiry is also the foundation of good public policy. It shapes and informs how we address global threats such as ozone depletion, an issue on which the international community has made real progress. Science must play an equally central role in how we address climate change. 

When we want to know what to do about a public health or environmental crisis, we turn to science. For example, rigorous, careful data collection and analysis is critical to understanding long-term trends.

Data can show the effectiveness of a medication in treating a disease, for example, or the ability of a new material to withstand extreme conditions over time.  And data can help us to make good decisions based on those trends. 

Never have we had a greater ability to collect and analyze data than today. That’s why, more than ever, in today’s world, science should drive policy, not the other way around. 

In a number of areas, I’ve worked with Republican colleagues on bipartisan bills that help advance scientific inquiry, from encouraging citizen science projects to improving public private partnerships with our national labs.

So why is climate science so threatening to some? 

Sadly, there are far too many organizations in existence today that have it backwards. These organizations have attempted to distort science for purely political ends because the facts threaten the bottom line of those who have created and sustained them.  These organizations claim to use “sound science” to support policy objectives, but their actions indicate that the only science they find sound is the kind that sounds like profits. 

One of these organizations is the now defunct Advancement of Sound Science Coalition, known as the TASSC – an organization that played a key role in obscuring the facts around the dangers of tobacco use. 

TASSC was originally founded back in 1993 under the guise of promoting, quote, “sound science in policymaking.” 

In reality, as was later uncovered in the documents that came to light as in the course of litigation against the tobacco industry, TASSC actually had the opposite goal. The year it was founded, it stated in private documents at the time that one of its goals was to lay the groundwork to help Phillip Morris advance its agenda – of promoting tobacco use – nationally and at the state and local level. How? By, and I quote from one of these discovered documents, “encouraging the public to question – from the grassroots up – the validity of scientific studies.” 

These are not the statements of an organization devoted to scientific inquiry and data-driven policy.

Let me be clear: the problem doesn’t lie in industry hiring scientists to argue their case. That’s well within the rights of industry and any organization in our country. The problem is when groups like this one misrepresent their very motives, hide their sources of funding and industry ties, and push out misleading or even incorrect information under the guise of “sound science.”

We all know today that smoking tobacco is harmful to our health, profoundly harmful to our health.  Yet these same organizations, the ones that decades ago promoted “science” that hid the truth about tobacco and threatened public health for far too long, are now, in sadly too many cases, doing the same with climate change.

Fortunately, today, this group I’m now discussing TASSC is now defunct. But its former executive director, Steve Milloy, is still an active climate change denier and editor of junkscience.com.

In fact, Milloy helped draft the 1998 “Global Climate Science Communications Action Plan.”  It included the statement, quote, “Victory Will Be Achieved When Average citizens ‘understand’ the uncertainties in climate science; recognition of uncertainties becomes part of the ‘conventional wisdom.’”

Quite simply, his goal was and continues to be to persuade people, using incorrect, scientifically unsound information, to doubt the science about climate change, one of the greatest global challenges we face. His policy goal is to halt action on climate change, and he is using science incorrectly to achieve this political end.

Frankly, this is dangerous, it is irresponsible, and it flies in the face of the foundation of the scientific method.  

As someone who trained in chemistry in college, I am familiar with how scientists are trained to formulate hypotheses, carefully construct experiments to test those hypotheses, and – without bias or preformed assumptions – then draw conclusions about those hypotheses.

Starting with the answer and only considering evidence that supports that answer — that’s not science – that’s politics.

Madam President, the existence of groups like TASSC and others that my colleagues will speak about this evening and tomorrow make clear that we must work even harder to defend and support science throughout our society. 

That means providing robust funding for our national lab system.

That means establishing a federal effort to coordinate research in a new subfield of chemistry that I’ve been excited about promoting. 

That means promoting the use of crowdsourcing and citizen science methods in federal agencies.

That means supporting policies that will support industry-relevant training in engineering, including advanced manufacturing. 

All of these are efforts that I’ve been in involved and that enjoy bipartisan support.  My colleagues know that I make an effort to promote pragmatic, bipartisan policy ideas.  Science should not be a partisan issue.  And neither, frankly, should climate change.

Climate change is all too real for those of us who live in low lying coastal states like my home state of Delaware, where flooding has devastated homes and communities up and down our state.

The science is clear: this severe flooding is only going to increase as temperatures continue to rise around the globe and as the sea level rises as well. 

Madam President, we live in an era of unprecedented scientific and technological advances.  The NASA Juno spacecraft mission to Jupiter, the ability to use 3-D printing to manufacture custom products, specifically prosthetics, the evolution of new developments in robotics and genomics – these advances capture our imagination and can change our world. 

These developments happen because America’s best-trained scientists and engineers have spent decades undertaking rigorous and innovative research, and applying their findings to address the big questions of our world.

Certainly the challenges of climate change are daunting and urgent, and so we should be focused on using the best science available to tackle these challenges with the best policy solutions possible – not by convincing people who prefer denial and deception that the science isn’t even real. 

Madam President, I want to thank my friend and colleague Senator Whitehouse for his tireless leadership in addressing climate change and assembling today’s important colloquy.

Senator Coons’ statement on tragic death of Lewes volunteer firefighter

WILMINGTON, Del. – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) issued the statement below following yesterday’s tragic accident that claimed the life of Lewes firefighter Tim McClanahan.

“I am heartbroken about the tragic accident that took the life of Lewes Volunteer Firefighter Tim McClanahan yesterday evening. In Delaware and across the country, it has been a challenging week for America’s first responders who place their lives on the line every day for our safety and protection. My thoughts and prayers are with the McClanahan family and Delaware’s volunteer firefighting community.” 

Senator Coons’ statement on Michigan shooting

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) issued the statement below following yesterday’s shooting at a courthouse in Michigan.

“I’m saddened by yet another report of a senseless shooting, this time in a courthouse in Michigan. My prayers are with the families and friends of the two bailiffs whose lives were taken far too soon. Yesterday’s shooting is another reminder of the dangers our law enforcement community faces every day.

“This has been a difficult seven days for America. I grieve for the families and friends of those killed in Minnesota, Louisiana, Texas, and now Michigan. As a nation, we can and will do better.”