Related Issues

Related Issues

[VIDEO] Senator Coons on Trump’s choices for Secretary of State: “President-elect Trump has very limited foreign policy experience, so it’s my hope that he will nominate… someone with real experience”

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, today joined Andrea Mitchell Reports on MSNBC to talk about President-elect Donald Trump’s choices for Secretary of State and Russia’s attacks on U.S. cybersecurity.

Excerpts from the interview:

Sen. Coons on President-elect Trump’s Secretary of State shortlist: “President-elect Trump has very limited foreign policy experience, so it’s my hope that he will nominate for Secretary of State someone with real experience, someone who’s well-grounded, and someone who can work in a diplomatic way with our vital allies and with Congress” 

Sen. Coons: “Our role as a member of the loyal opposition… is going to be to make sure that President-elect Trump’s nominees get what Judge Merrick Garland never got, which is a free and fair hearing”

Sen. Coons on Russian attacks on U.S. cybersecurity: “I think it’s outrageous we haven’t had hearings yet, full hearings, in a number of committees…. Leaders of our intelligence community across a number of agencies notified Congress and made it clear to the public that they believe at the highest levels the Russian government was directly involved in hacking into elements of our political system”

 

Full video and audio available here: http://bit.ly/2gL1U8l 

 

ICYMI: Senator Coons ranked in top three of the most productive Senators

WASHINGTON – In case you missed it, U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) came in third place in a list of current Senators who backed the most bills that have become law. The data is pulled from the independent congressional tracking website, GovTrack.

Read the full article below:

 

Medill on the Hill: WHICH SENATORS HAVE PASSED THE MOST LAWS?

By Benjamin Din

 

WASHINGTON — With a little over a month to go for the current Congress, what the lawmakers accomplished in the last two years can be measured in different ways. One yardstick: Who backed the most bills that have become law? 

The top honor goes to Sen. Amy Klobuchar, according to an analysis of legislative data from GovTrack, an independent congressional tracking website. The second-term Minnesota Democrat has sponsored or co-sponsored 27 bills that have been enacted into law. By comparison, seven senators have seen 12 bills they put their names on —?the median number —?become law, including Democrats Elizabeth Warren and Cory Booker and Republican Lindsey Graham.

“I’ve always approached this work by putting the people of Minnesota first,” Klobuchar said in an e-mail. “For me, that means working across the aisle to get things done. While it hasn’t been the easiest year to bring people together —?OK, that was an understatement —?I have gotten to know the people I work with and always look for common ground when I can find it.”

Ten other senators join Klobuchar in the 20-plus club. Despite Republican majorities in both the House and Senate in the 114th Congress, eight of the 11 are Democrats, and, contrary to conventional wisdom, there’s a healthy mix of experience levels included. 

The longest-serving senator in the top 11 is Sen. Orrin Hatch, the most senior Republican in the Senate. Hatch was first sworn in as a senator for Utah in 1977. In contrast, the least-experienced senator, New Hampshire Republican Kelly Ayotte, is wrapping up her first and final six-year term. She lost her bid for re-election by fewer than 1,000 votes.

Sarah Binder, a George Washington University professor of political science who specializes in Congress and legislative politics, cautioned against defining success in the Senate by hard metrics, such as the number of bills enacted into law. Instead, it’s important to note the dual responsibilities of senators — as lawmakers and as “representatives coming and making present the views of their state.”

Some politicians, she said, may not have their names on many bills that become law, but they have the power to influence the legislative agenda. Most notably, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has only sponsored or co-sponsored seven bills that became law, and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada has seen three of his enacted. No one would question their legislative influence.

A CNN/ORC poll released Sunday found that more than 80 percent of Americans believe the country is more divided on major issues this year than in the past. However, Republican calls for bipartisanship are lower now than they were in 2008, when the Democrats took control of both Congress and the White House.

Still, several of the senators who made the cut for the top 11 from both sides of the political spectrum echoed Klobuchar’s sentiments and emphasized bipartisanship as a factor in their success. In fact, two of the senators on the list —?Roy Blunt, a Missouri Republican, and Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat —?have worked together to produce bipartisan bills. Blunt told USA Today in June that the two have been friends for about 30 years, and of the about five things they agree upon, “all five of those are now federal law.”

“When Ohioans write my office, they aren’t thinking about whether I’m a Republican or Democrat. They’re thinking about the loss of a job, a bill they’re struggling to pay or the crumbling road they drive to school or work each day,” said Brown, who came in fourth on the list of most bills enacted into law, in an e-mail. “My job is to serve them, and to do that I’ve got to seek out common ground with my colleagues. … We aren’t always successful, but striking up bipartisan conversations on the issues facing our constituents is the first step to passing legislation.”

Bills can be insignificant —?such as ones to rename post offices and issue commemorative coins — and newer politicians may be more likely to introduce bills to bolster their records with re-election in view, Binder noted. Because of this, it’s possible that hard metrics could overstate or understate a senator’s influence.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who came in seventh, has been successful because she introduces bills that she believes can become law, spokesman Tom Mentzer said. A look at Feinstein’s legislative record in the 114th Congress shows she has worked on important California issues such as homelessness, which affects her home city of San Francisco, where she was once mayor.

“A willingness to work with both parties and have flexibility to find common ground is vital,” he said in an e-mail. “It goes beyond the bills the senator introduces.” 

Feinstein worked closely with Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., on a bill related to Lake Tahoe, a popular freshwater lake that straddles the California-Nevada border, Mentzer said.

“She asked him to introduce her own bill because it would have a better chance at passage with a Republican sponsor,” he said. “It’s about getting results, no matter what path that requires.”

Binder said it is not surprising that Democrats are heavy hitters in the Senate —?a traditionally more bipartisan chamber — even though Republicans are in control. With President Barack Obama in the White House, that “helps fuel more effort on the Democrats’ side, even when they’re in the minority,” she said.

“Republicans and Democrats disagree on lots of issues, but when bipartisan solutions solve real problems I’m all for it,” Blunt, who ranked eighth in a four-way tie, said in an e-mail. “I’ve worked with my Democrat colleagues to pass legislation to boost manufacturing, expand access to mental health care, reauthorize the Victims of Child Abuse Act, and provide the largest funding increase the National Institutes of Health has received in over a decade. I’ve always looked for areas of common ground where we can work together to address Americans’ priorities, and look forward to continuing that effort.” 

The other senators on the top 11 list are Democratic Sens. Al Franken of Minnesota, Chuck Schumer of New York, Chris Coons of Delaware, Dick Durbin of Illinois, and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island. 

GovTrack compiles data on legislative records. Senators’ bills that became law include those that were enacted via a companion bill in the House.

 

Bipartisan Senators Question Rush to Expand DOJ Hacking Authority Without Congressional Oversight

Washington, D.C.–Senators Chris Coons, D-Del., Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Steve Daines, R-Mont., today made a last-ditch effort to delay broad new government hacking authority that is now set to go into effect tomorrow.

Wyden, Coons and Daines asked the Senate to pass or vote on three separate measures to block or delay a set of new rules that would broadly expand government hacking authority without any Congressional input or hearing. The bipartisan group of senators has repeatedly asked for hearings to consider potentially sweeping changes to how the government can hack, search or size Americans’ personal phones, computers and other devices.

“If we fail to act today, these changes to Rule 41 will go into effect tomorrow without any hearing or markup to consider and evaluate the impact of the changes,” said Senator Coons. “While the proposed changes are not necessarily bad or good, they are serious, and they present significant privacy concerns that warrant careful consideration and debate. That’s why I joined my colleagues from both sides of the aisle today in calling for prompt passage of our legislation to delay implementation of the changes for six months. It is our responsibility to do our jobs and thoroughly evaluate the merits and ramifications of the proposed changes.” 

By sitting here and doing nothing, the Senate has given consent to this expansion of government hacking and surveillance,” Wyden said.Law-abiding Americans are going to ask ‘what were you guys thinking? when the FBI starts hacking victims of a botnet hack. Or when a mass hack goes awry and breaks their device, or an entire hospital system and puts lives at risk.”

“We can’t give unlimited power for unlimited hacking – putting Americans’ civil liberties at risk,” Senator Daines stated. 

Sen. Wyden first asked the Senate to pass his Stopping Mass Hacking (SMH) Act, co-sponsored by Sen. Daines, to block the rules from taking effect. Sen. Coons followed by asking unanimous consent to pass his Review the Rule Act, to delay the changes for 6 months. After those requests were rejected, Sen. Wyden asked for a vote on just a 3-month delay, through his Stalling Mass Damaging Hacking Act, which was also denied by Republican leaders.

ICYMI: Senator Coons to lead bipartisan tributes to Vice President Biden

WASHINGTON – In case you missed it, below is an article from Politico spotlighting a bipartisan tribute to honor Vice President Joe Biden led by U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.). The hour-long tribute is scheduled for the afternoon of December 7, 2016. Other Senators participating include Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Senator Tom Carper (D-Del.), Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.). 

Politico: Senate to offer bipartisan tributes to Biden
By Seung Min Kim

Vice President Joe Biden has his share of bipartisan admirers in the Senate, where he served for 36 years before heading to the White House as President Barack Obama’s second-in-command. 

And a group of Democrats and Republicans will honor Biden’s legacy both in the administration and on Capitol Hill next month with a series of Senate floor tributes to the outgoing vice president — with Biden in attendance. 

The tribute is the brainchild of Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who now holds the Senate seat that Biden occupied for more than three decades. Coons first approached Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) with the idea in August, and McConnell — who’s worked closely with Biden in the past, including negotiating a way for Congress to extricate itself from the fiscal cliff crisis in late 2012 — was quickly on board, Coons said.

“I don’t think we’re going to have a public life without Joe Biden,” Coons said in an interview Monday. “I am very hopeful that he will remain a very strong, very effective voice in Washington, internationally and in Delaware. I view it as a celebration of his next chapter in public service.”

The hour-long tribute is scheduled for Dec. 7 in the afternoon. Coons will kick it off, and other top senators will follow with their own accolades for Biden — including McConnell, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).

“The leader agreed with it and is helping to make it happen,” McConnell spokesman Don Stewart said.

Biden spokeswoman Meghan Dubyak confirmed that the vice president indeed plans to attend the tribute. 

Though his name has been batted around for various political jobs, including the next chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Biden has said he plans to focus on initiatives to battle cancer once he leaves office. His son, Beau Biden, died from brain cancer last year.

“He has made an enormous difference already in fighting for cures for cancer, in supporting state and local law enforcement and in working in a bipartisan way to push some very important issues internationally and domestically,” Coons said. “But frankly, he also has a deserved reputation for being an incredibly loyal friend and for being a very straight-talking, common-sense senator.”

Carper, Coons Urge President-elect Trump to Comply with Emoluments Clause in the U.S. Constitution

WASHINGTON— U.S. Senators Tom Carper and Chris Coons (both D-Del) joined a resolution today to state the sense of Congress that President-elect Trump should follow the precedent established by prior presidents and convert his assets to simple, conflict-free holdings, adopt blind trusts managed by an independent trustees, or take other equivalent measures in order to ensure compliance with the United States Constitution. 

The resolution notes that in the absence of such actions by the President-elect before he assumes office or without specific authorization by Congress, Congress will regard dealings by Trump-owned companies with any entity owned by a foreign governmental actor as potential violations of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause.

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution provides that “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

Joining Senators Carper and Coons in introducing his resolution as original co-sponsors are Senators: Ben Carden (D-Md.); Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.); Harry Reid (D-Nev.); Dick Durbin (D-Ill.); Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.); Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.); Ron Wyden (D-Ore.); Jack Reed (D-R.I.); Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.); Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.); Tom Udall (D-N.M.); Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.); Michael Bennet (D-Colo.); Al Franken (D-Minn.); Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.); Chris Murphy (D-Conn.); Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii); Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.); Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.); Ed Markey (D-Mass.); and Cory Booker (D-N.J.).

Senator Coons’ statement on President-elect Trump’s nomination of Governor Nikki Haley to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the UN

WILMINGTON, Del. – Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, issued the following statement following the nomination of Governor Nikki Haley to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations:

“Our next ambassador to the United Nations must use our influence to advance American interests and values, and build multilateral support for our positions. Governor Haley deserves fair, thorough scrutiny before taking on this important role. I commend Governor Haley for rejecting during the campaign President-elect Trump’s divisive rhetoric and for calling his proposed ban on Muslims from entering the U.S. for what it is: unconstitutional and un-American. I hope she will continue to provide her unvarnished opinion to the Oval Office should she be confirmed for this important post. I look forward to digging into Governor Haley’s record, experience, and qualifications for this critical role.”

Senator Coons: A few thoughts on Thanksgiving

WILMINGTON, Del. – Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) issued the following statement for Thanksgiving:

“In the days since the election, I’ve heard from many Delawareans of different backgrounds and political perspectives. They’ve shared their hopes and fears about the election and what it means.

“Thanksgiving is often our only chance to see family and friends with other points of view. Our dinner tables reflect our national conversation, leading some to fear this Thanksgiving dinner might feel less like a family reunion and more like a cable news set. In the spirit of coming together, I hope we’ll try to see this holiday as an opportunity.

“What do I mean by that? I hope Thanksgiving will give us an opportunity to practice listening and hearing those with whom we disagree, rather than simply preparing our own comeback. I hope we can ask the questions we may not have asked before we went to the polls. I hope we’ll see this time as an opportunity to dive not just into Black Friday sales, but also into conversation with someone we may only see once a year.

“Elections are about far more than just winning or losing. They’re about listening to each other, taking stock of where we’re at, and figuring out how to move forward because, ultimately, we’re in this together.

“That’s not easy, especially after an election defined by levels of intolerance and divisiveness our country hasn’t seen in a generation. But we have to try to come together precisely because it’s hard. The only way we’ll change is if we begin to hear each other and find a common purpose.

“We can make a difference right now. We can listen to each other. We can look out for our friends, neighbors, or strangers who may be hurting. We can hear them and we can lift them up. We can find an opportunity to give back.

“Thanksgiving is a uniquely American holiday that reflects some of the best of our society. It’s a chance to take a breath and reflect on what we’re grateful for and what truly matters. Rather than avoiding these difficult conversations, let’s use them as a time to hear each other and to practice kindness.

“One way we can embody the spirit of Thanksgiving following a difficult election is by giving a few hours of our time to those in need of a helping hand. Visiting Volunteer Delaware is a great place to find a service project near you.

“I wish you a happy Thanksgiving with many laughs, fond memories, and — yes — some healthy disagreements.”

Coons, Wyden: DOJ Dodges Senate Questions About Government Hacking

Washington, D.C. – Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. and Chris Coons, D-Del., are deeply disappointed with the Justice Department’s failure to substantively answer many of the questions by 23 U.S. lawmakers about a new expanded mass hacking authority that is set to go into effect next month if Congress does not act.  

“While I am pleased that the Department of Justice responded to our October letter concerning the proposed amendments to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, many questions remain unanswered,” said Senator Coons. “That is why I continue to believe Congress should have a substantive debate surrounding any changes before they go into effect on December 1, 2016.  Congress should pass my Review the Rule Act (S.3475) and ensure we have adequate time to do our job and consider and debate these changes.”

“The American people deserve answers to these very basic questions about how our government intends to hack thousands or millions of personal devices with a single warrant,” Wyden said. “The Justice Department’s failure to answer these questions should be a big blinking warning sign about whether the government can be trusted to carry out these hacks without harming the security and privacy of innocent Americans’ phones, computers and other devices.”

The Justice Department’s response, which is available here, did not provide details about how the government will uphold fundamental protections, including:

  • How to prevent “forum shopping” by federal prosecutors when seeking a single warrant to hack thousands or millions of devices;
  • Whether and how the government plans to “clean” devices belonging to innocent Americans, including under what legal authority;
  • How the government would prevent further damaging a compromised device already hacked by both a criminal and the government;
  • Whether having your device “damaged,” and connected to a crime, is probable cause to search it.

Sen. Coons and Sen. Steve Daines R-Mont., along with Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, have introduced a bipartisan bill to delay the rule changes for 6 months, co-sponsored by Wyden.

Senator Coons’ statement on the nomination of Senator Jeff Sessions to serve as U.S. Attorney General

WILMINGTON, Del. – Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, issued the following statement on the nomination of Senator Jeff Sessions to serve as U.S. Attorney General:

“Today, President-elect Trump nominated Senator Sessions to serve as Attorney General, the top federal law enforcement official in our country. During our time as colleagues on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Sessions and I have worked constructively together on some important matters, including the reauthorization of the Victims of Child Abuse Act. We have also disagreed about many issues fundamental to the direction of the country, including immigration, civil rights, and criminal justice. As a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the confirmation process is a responsibility I take seriously. The Department of Justice must ensure the fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. I am committed to treating Senator Sessions’ nomination fairly, and I expect Senators of both parties to scrutinize closely Senator Sessions’ record and experience to determine whether he is an appropriate candidate for this critical post.”

 

Bipartisan, bicameral bill would delay changes to government hacking powers

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Al Franken (D-Minn.), together with Reps. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) and Ted Poe (R-Texas), introduced legislation to provide Congress the time necessary to seriously consider and debate the proposed changes to Rule 41 that would expand the government’s ability to search computers and other digital devices. The Review the Rule Act would delay the proposed changes to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41 from going into force until July 1, 2017. Without congressional action, the proposed changes will go into effect on December 1, 2016.

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41 governs the procedures and parameters for issuing search warrants.  Under current law, a federal judge may issue a warrant to search property located within a specific judicial district.  At the urging of the Department of Justice, the Supreme Court ultimately approved two sweeping amendments to Rule 41:

1.     A judge may issue a warrant to remotely search, copy, and seize information from a device that does not have a known location (and may not be in the district) because the location has been concealed through technological means; and

2.     A single judge may issue a warrant to remotely search and copy information from suspected devices across five or more districts.

“The proposed changes are serious, and present significant privacy concerns that warrant careful consideration and debate,” said Senator Coons, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “Our bicameral, bipartisan legislation will give Congress time to do our job and carefully consider and evaluate the merits of these proposed changes to the government’s ability to search personal computers and other digital devices. It is essential that these rules strike a careful balance: giving law enforcement the tools it needs to keep us safe, while also protecting Americans’ constitutional rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches.”

“We cannot give the federal government a blank check to infringe on Americans’ civil liberties,” said Senator Daines. “Congress needs the appropriate time to investigate the implications of this rule on Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights.” 

“A single prosecutor should not have the power to hack into the phone or computer of virtually anyone in the United States,” said Senator Lee, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “Yes, federal law enforcement does need new tools to stop and prosecute botnets, but the proposed Rule 41 rule change goes too far. The sensible thing to do is delay the implementation of this rule and allow Congress to investigate further.”

“This rule change would give the government unprecedented power to hack into Americans’ personal devices,” Senator Wyden said. “This was an alarming proposition before the election. Today, Congress needs to think long and hard about whether to hand this power to James Comey and the administration of someone who openly said he wants the power to hack his political opponents the same way Russia does.”  

“I remain deeply concerned about the intended and unintended consequences of the expanded authorities contemplated in the proposed changes to Rule 41,” said John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member. “The bill we offer today will delay implementation until Congress has had a meaningful opportunity to examine the proposal in detail.  Until we have adequately addressed the privacy concerns raised by my colleagues, this rule change should not take effect.”         

“Government does not have the authority to unilaterally legalize widespread abusive hacking,” said Rep. Poe.  “It is Congress’ responsibility to safeguard the constitutional rights of the people they represent from a power hungry Executive Branch. A delay in the proposed changes to Rule 41 is necessary to ensure that the newly elected Congress, and Administration, have the ability to carefully evaluate this rule change before it goes into effect to ensure that it is constitutional and in the best interests of the American people. Rushing to put the changes in place in the middle of the lame duck session is irresponsible. Too much is at stake to not get this right.”