Related Issues

Related Issues

Floor Speech: Delaware Week of Service

I rise to mark national volunteer week and Delaware volunteer week. Americans and Delawareans will be engaged in volunteer services.  Volunteer opportunities include helping the homeless, tending to the environment and working to keep our communities safer and stronger and free from fires and accidents and injuries.

Here in the Senate, one can’t talk community service or national service or volunteerism without thanking and recognizing our colleague, Senator Barbara Mikulski from my neighboring State of Maryland.  She has been a leader for years on volunteerism, most of them alongside the late Senator Ted Kennedy, and I am proud to be working with her fight to save our national service programs.

When Delaware’s tireless governor was sworn into office in 2009, he decided to forgo the traditional governor’s inaugural ball and he along with his wonderful wife instead organized a week of service across our state.  Today, that week of service continues and has become a tremendous opportunity for non-profit organizations, community service organizations across our state connect with Delawareans excited about teaching our children the value of volunteerism, connecting with our neighbors and helping improve and strengthen our community.

I’ve long believed that those who engage in volunteerism and service to others in fact get more out of it than they put into it.  Volunteerism is a fundamental part of what it means to be American.  It is a great – some would say the greatest – part of America and its cultural traditions.  However, volunteerism need not be confined to my state or to this week.  It is something from which every American can benefit.  In my view, one of the most effective volunteerism efforts is one with which I was first engaged when I was a resident briefly of your state, when I was working for the national “I Have a Dream” Foundation in New York City many years ago.

The national AmeriCorps program, a partnership between the federal government and local nonprofit communities was launched with bipartisan support, initially an idea proposed by President Bush and then enacted by President Clinton.  The AmeriCorps program is now one which has had a tremendous impact.  It enables 75,000 Americans annually to serve via AmeriCorps with a very wide range of programs, programs where the funding is raised and its focus is directed by state-by-state commissions of volunteers — community leaders who help identify the best and most appropriate, most effective partners for this federally funded program that is also matched one to one from dollars from the local community.  So far more than 60 million hours of community service annually have been provided by AmeriCorps members.

In Delaware, the volunteer fire service is one of the strongest parts of that long and proud history of our state. There are more than seventy volunteer fire companies in our state.  They provide the vast majority of fire suppression service for our communities and they faced a real problem when I became County Executive.  A steady loss in membership, as working-class families were under more and more pressure, more folks, both parents are working, they’re under more stresses, more demands, it became more and more difficult for people to dedicate the time and the energy needed to be trained and serve as volunteer firefighters – and, in particular, to deliver ambulance service, one of the most important aspects of our volunteer fire service.  So, in partnership with our New Castle County Volunteer Firefighters Association and with the YMCA and with AmeriCorps, I worked tirelessly to launch a new AmeriCorps program called the Emergency Services Corps.

The Emergency Service Corps helps recruit volunteer firefighters, conduct CPR and first aid training, and provides fire awareness training for schoolchildren across our county.  So far they’ve recruited more than 220 new volunteer firefighters and logged more than 100,000 hours of service to our community in the five years since it was created as a partnership between all these different entities. 

I just thought, Madam President, I would draw attention to that one example today of the hundreds of AmeriCorps programs across our country that are a shining example, I think, of how the young people of this country, people of all ages across this country, bring their gifts, their talent and their spirit to volunteering.  In every generation of Americans heeding the call to service has been the answer to our greatest challenges, and with so many out of work, suffering from hunger or facing homelessness right here in our own country, I think it’s critical we all pitch in to help.  It’s an affirmation of our bonds of citizenship and compassion to fellow citizens.

I’d like to encourage everyone in my state to visit the Volunteer Delaware web site to find volunteer opportunities this week.  I’m putting a link to it on my web site at coons.senate.gov and urge those outside Delaware to participate in this national volunteerism week. 

###

Floor Speech: Real consequences if the federal government shuts down

Mr. President, I rise today to add my voice to those who’ve spoken on this chamber floor this afternoon, to express frustration and concern about where we are as our federal government seems to be moving inexorably towards a shutdown this evening.  As I have worked hard with my staff here in Washington and at home to help them prepare for and explain to the people who I represent what’s going on here and why, I have struggled.  I have genuinely struggled to understand why this impasse is leading, I think now inevitably, towards a government shutdown.

 I still remain hopeful that we will be able to find some resolution in these last few hours, but I think it’s critical that the people of the United States understand the consequences of a government shutdown, that this isn’t just about sending home federal employees.  This is going to have a significant impact on our economy, on our recovery, on working families all over this country, and I think on our reputation around the world.  At a time when many of us are standing up and saying the United States, our system of Democratic capitalism, is a model that other nations should follow, our inability as a body, the House and Senate working together to reach a responsible consensus on what we all  agree is one of our top priorities, is profoundly frustrating to me. 

I was elected by the people of Delaware and sent here to deal with three things: to try and get our private sector going again creating high quality good jobs for the people of Delaware and our country, to deal with our significant deficit and our dramatic national debt and the very real challenge to our future posed by that, and to try and do it in a responsible and balanced and bipartisan way. And in my view, at this point, in this budget fight, from everything I have been able to hear from the press and from the leadership of my party here in this body, it has stopped being about cutting the deficit and has instead turned into a fight about ideology.  If I understand correctly, as of last night at the end of the negotiations, they moved from having sixty riders, so called, on the bill that would fund the federal government for the rest of the year, being down to just one or two.

Now I thought one of the good things that came out of the 2010 election was a broad based focus, particularly by some in the Tea Party, but lots of folks in our country who were upset by with Washington works, a broad based focus to stop having bills that were loaded up with lots of riders and lots of extraneous things, and to try and have common sense legislation that is easy to understand and that does what it is meant to do.  Well this as I understand it is no longer about the deficit and about the budget.  We are not being asked to consider whether or not we should cut 70 billion or 72 billion or 78 billion. 

We are instead being asked to agree to defunding Title X.  Title X, a program that goes back to 1970, Mr. President, was enacted into law and signed into law by President Nixon and provides a remarkable range of health services to women all across this country.  I

n my state of Delaware, there are 26 community health centers that are funded by Title X.  Just five of them are affiliated in some way with Planned Parenthood, and I just wanted to come to the floor and take a moment and focus on what Title X funds:  preventative health services, contraceptive services, pregnancy testing, but also screening for cervical and breast cancer, screening for blood pressure, anemia, diabetes, basic infertility services, health education and referrals out to social services.  I know and have visited several of these community health centers in my state.  They provide tremendous services to folks who otherwise have no access to high quality, modern health care.  And if I really understand correctly that what’s happened in this body is that we have come down to being willing to shut down the entire federal government over this one issue of ideology, I am embarrassed and ashamed on some level that we can’t get this resolved. 

As I understand it, the folks who came to Washington seeking aggressive deficit reductions and spending cuts in this fiscal year have achieved virtually all of their objectives.  I think the initial goal was 100 billion.  And my understanding, as you heard as well Mr. President today in our caucus lunch, was we have agreed to up to $78 billion in spending cuts in this fiscal year, across the board from lots of different sources, from domestic, discretionary as well as other programs that can be cut in this year. 

And that is a hard concession for folks who support government action in our community and our society to accept.  But I think one of our challenges is for the folks who may be on the other side of this debate to hear yes, to accept that we have come almost 80 percent of the way to meeting their initial goal and to instead recognize that I think this has long since turned into a fight over ideology over the narrow issue of women’s health. 

Let me give you one last example if I can of what this really means in my hometown.  My Senate office in Delaware and I have been working hard for several months to follow on the example of my predecessor in this seat, Sen. Ted Kaufman of Delaware, and host a job fair.  Monday from nine to four, at the single biggest public space in Delaware, the Riverfront Arts Center, we are going to host a job fair, and we have got more than 50 employers lined up and ready to interview people.  We expect more than 1,000 out of work Delawareans to show up resumes in hand ready to be interviewed, hopefully and to be hired.

 But if I understand the rules right, if the federal government shuts down tonight, my staff can’t carry out this job fair on Monday. Job one for me, and I think job one for all of is in this chamber, is helping our private sector, helping small businesses, helping our communities connect good jobs with the folks who are out of work and seeking employment.  Fortunately in our case, we have scrambled and worked hard in the last few days, the Governor of Delaware, our Department of Labor, the Delaware Economic Office, other volunteers have stepped up,  and they are going to work hard to make sure this job fair comes off Monday just fine without interruption.

We need to be focused on reigning in the deficit and the debt, dealing with our long term budget, and getting folks back to work. 

It is my hope Mr. President, in conclusion, that as a body, that we can come together in a common sense way, if we need to have a vote on the floor, if we need to have a fight about access to health care for women and Title X, let’s have that debate.  But this should be a discussion today about the deficit and about funding the operation of the federal government for the year ahead.  I look forward and hope we can turn back to that very real work and not instead have a fight about ideology and access to women’s health care. 

###

Floor Speech: Addressing the critical need for patent reform

However complicated applied sciences may have been back in 1836, when Congress first established the forerunner to the Patent and Trademark Office, they are infinitely more complicated today. Never has the PTO been more essential, more central to ensuring the system of nationwide patents contemplated by our Founding Fathers is possible than today. 

Our PTO must have clear objective guidelines that enable an applicant to predict whether his or her application for a patent will be approved.  That application process must move expeditiously, and at the end of that process, when PTO issues a patent, the inventor and industry must have confidence that the patent is of good quality and will provide good defense against future challenges.

 In recent years, however, the Patent and Trademark Office has fallen short of these critical objectives.  

Today, a patent applicant must wait over two years before an examiner first even picks up the application.  Two years. 

At this very moment more than 700,000 applications simply sit at the Patent and Trademark Office awaiting future consideration.  Each one of those applications represents an idea that could create a job, or ten jobs, or 1000 jobs.  If you file an application at PTO today, you can expect to wait just over three and a half years for an initial disposition, and should the PTO make an error in their examination, it would take three years more to appeal it. 

In a world in which startup companies depend on patents to secure critical venture capital and other funding, these wait times are just too long.  And while the PTO director, Kappos, has achieved some critical success and has begun to right the ship at the Patent and Trademark Office, he simply can’t accomplish acceptable and sustainable reforms without our action here in the Senate. 

The American Invents Act takes a number of critical steps to improve the efficiency with which this country handles patents, all of them designed to make the U.S. more competitive in the global economy.   

Mr. President, first, the America Invents Act will give the PTO the tools it needs to address the unacceptably long backlog of patent applications.  In February 2009, despite an increasing need for qualified patent examiners, PTO had to institute a hiring freeze.  PTO is a user fee supported organization, and so I believe it should be able to pass through the cost of staffing needs to patent applicants to ensure these wait times don’t continue to grow. This bill would finally give the PTO the authority to set its own fees rather than having to wait for an act of Congress to do so.

 Another source of the back log is the issue of patent fee diversion, one with which I have long been familiar. Currently the fees paid by patent applicants, for the purpose of funding the cost of examination, can be diverted away from the PTO to the Treasury without justification by Congress.   

Patent fee diversion cripples the ability of the Patent and Trademark Office to do its job and is essentially an unwarranted tax on innovation.  In the past 20 years, more than $800 million have been diverted from the Patent and Trademark Office.  And, though in recent years, almost no money has been diverted – thanks to the determined leadership of my colleague, Senator Mikulski, the PTO funding should never depend on shifting political fortunes. 

Even in times of political favor, the mere possibility of fee diversion is harmful to PTO because it robs the ability of the Patent and Trademark Office to plan with confidence that a varying workload will be matched by future funding.  This bill does not currently address the issue of patent fee diversion, but that is something I and others are working to change. 

Ending fee diversion is perhaps the single most effective thing we can do to empower the Patent and Trademark Office to reduce the patent back log over the long term.  That’s why I look forward to supporting Doctor Coburn’s amendment, which would ensure that the PTO has access to the fees that it charges, subject to continuing Congressional Oversight, of course. 

The second thing that the America Invents Act does, to make the United States more competitive, is to improve the predictability and accuracy of the patent examination process.  By transitioning to a first-to-file system, this bill will bring the United States patent system in line with the rest of the world.  Under this first-to-file system, the PTO’s task of determining the priority of a patent application will be much more straight forward, because patent priority with depend on objective public facts rather than secret individual funds. 

And to those smaller inventors that are concerned that the move to a first-to-file system will allow larger companies to beat them out in a race to the Patent Office, this bill contains important protections for all inventors, large or small.  Even under the first-to-file system contemplated in this Act, an inventor’s patent priority is protected for a year if he or she is the first to publicly disclose that invention.

 Not only does the America Invents Act make the patent process fair to inventors, but it will actually improve the quality of patents issued by the PTO by leveraging the knowledge of outside parties.  This bill permits third parties to provide submissions regarding prior art before a patent issued, enhancing the ability of examiners to determine whether an application is truly an innovative idea worthy of the protection of a patent.  

The bill takes another step forward towards improving patent quality by changing the way issuance in patents can be challenged.  The America Invents Act introduces a nine-month post-grant review process during which third parties can challenge a patent on any grounds. 

When you combine the new pre-issue and submission process and the new post grant review process, what I believe we will get is a more rigorous, more thorough vetting of patent applications.  And I believe as a result, we will get stronger, higher quality patents because of this America Invents Act.          

###

Maiden Speech: The Next Generation of American Manufacturing

Mr. President, I rise to speak in this chamber as a United States Senator for the first time.  It is an honor to do so, and already after my service at the end of the hundred and eleventh Congress, I am keenly aware of the impressive array of skills brought to this place by my colleagues and the great traditions of this chamber, as well as the tremendous challenges facing both our nation and this institution as we work to make progress.
  
On November second, the citizens of Delaware elected me to come here on their behalf to work with ninety-nine other Senators toward a very specific goal – getting America moving again and getting our economy back on track.  With our country just now recovering from the loss of so many jobs, with a substantial deficit, and the painful and lingering wreckage of a great recession, we must set aside politics and focus on progress.

I am honored to have this opportunity to serve.  I am especially honored to serve alongside our state’s distinguished senior Senator, Tom Carper and to serve at a time when the President of the Senate is another distinguished Delawarean, Vice President Joe Biden, whose service in this body for over thirty-six years was marked by a tireless advocacy for America’s middle class and the people of our state.  Membership in the United States Senate is a privilege not to be taken lightly, and I am determined to make the greatest contribution I can to solving the challenges facing us all.

Like my colleagues, my path to the Senate involved many experiences that have shaped my views and priorities.  Growing up in Delaware, my family taught me the values of faith, hard work, and service to others.  As a student, traveling and volunteering in Africa, and later working with the homeless here in this country, I learned difficult truths about poverty and human suffering but also witnessed the awesome power of hope and faith. 

Later, working for the National “I Have a Dream” Foundation and running an AmeriCorps program, I saw the transformative power of education and national service to change lives. 

Following my early years of service and learning, I spent eight years as in-house counsel at one of Delaware’s most innovative high-tech manufacturing companies, where I learned about the strength of American ingenuity and entrepreneurship.  Later, as County Executive, running a local government that served half a million Delawareans, I learned how to make tough choices to rein in spending, grow our local economy, to balance a budget, and to achieve a surplus. 

Most importantly, as a husband and a father of three young children, I spend more time than ever concerned about their future, wondering whether we will leave them and all our children a nation burdened by debt and struggling to maintain its place in the world, or with a renewed strength and focus on the fundamentals that made this the greatest nation in human history. 

Now, as a member of the Senate, I look forward to applying these lessons while working with my new colleagues.

Mr. President, I said a few moments ago our constituents sent us here with the goal of getting our economy back on track, a goal of focusing relentlessly on economic recovery. 

However, mere recovery – recovery alone – cannot be our goal.

The American people deserve and expect from us policies that will lead to an economy and job market stronger, more vibrant, and more prosperous than before. 

To achieve this, I believe we need to pursue a new manufacturing agenda, one that will lead to the creation of inventive businesses that will open new plants and hire skilled workers for modern and sustainable jobs – one that will produce the next generation of American manufacturers. 

It should focus on sustaining and growing American manufacturing by rewarding innovation and fostering entrepreneurship and pairing those great American strengths to a great workforce.

As someone committed to progressive values, I have long believed that the best way to help stabilize neighborhoods and support families, to advance social justice and fight poverty is through ensuring more and more Americans have access to good, quality jobs.

I am encouraged President Obama chose to highlight competitiveness and innovation in his State of the Union address and its potential to create sustainable middle class jobs.  He is right to call this our generation’s “Sputnik moment.” 

We have a choice:  we could keep doing things as we have for years, but then we’ll simply keep getting the same results.  Or, we can recommit ourselves, as we did as a nation during the Space Race, to out-innovate, out-compete, and out-produce every other country. 

That is how we, once again, can spark an era of growth and prosperity.

Unlike so many other sectors, with manufacturing it’s not just about creating jobs, it’s about creating and sustaining goodjobs – jobs that pay a livable wage and provide quality health insurance, jobs with longevity and security.

According to the National Association of Manufacturers, the average manufacturing worker in our country earned roughly twenty-five percent more than workers in all other sectors – that’s over seventy-two thousand dollars last year, including pay and benefits, while the average non-manufacturing worker earned less than fifty-nine thousand.

Manufacturing jobs mean higher wages and better benefits.  They have for decades been a reliable path to the middle class for millions of hard-working American families. 

That path is not nearly as wide or clear as it was just ten years ago. Since then, our nation has lost more than three million manufacturing jobs, not only to the developing world but to other industrialized nations as well. 

For those who have lost jobs, the stakes couldn’t be higher, for we as leaders our mandate cannot be clearer.

I strongly disagree with those who believe that America’s leadership in manufacturing is behind us, and that our future lies in being a country dedicated to services and consumption, financed by debt. 

Those naysayers point to the factories sprouting up across the developing world, with its cheaper labor and looser environmental and worker protections – key reasons why we have seen millions of our manufacturing jobs moved offshore. 

However, while labor-intensive commodity manufacturing may in fact have permanently moved to the developing world, we can remain a global leader in innovative and high performance manufacturing, as we are today in industries ranging from aircraft to pharmaceuticals, if we will just focus our efforts on creating an encouraging environment in tax and trade policy, in education and training, that matches the strength of American engineering and innovation.

Many Americans may not realize it, but ours remains the number one manufacturing economy in the world.  We still produce a fifth of all manufactured goods worldwide, and this sustains more than eighteen million private sector jobs. 

Advanced manufacturing businesses know that to achieve the quality and productivity they need, they must find a top-notch workforce, modern infrastructure, and a fair, predictable system of regulations.

I learned this firsthand when I was working in the private sector at a company called W.L. Gore and Associates.   Most may know it for discovering and marketing Gore-Tex fabrics, but it is a materials-based science company that manufactures hundreds of products, from medical devices to wire and cable.  At one point, I was part of a site location team that had to decide where to build a new state-of-the-art manufacturing plant costing more than a hundred million dollars. 

It could have been anywhere in the world, but we wanted to build it right here in America.  We considered many U.S. cities and states that were bidding for the plant and ultimately made our decision. 

What made the difference?  What were we looking for?  First and foremost, a skilled and reliable workforce.  Second, we wanted the state, county, and city governments to be responsive and to have made investments in local infrastructure.  While we also considered tax credits and training grants, an educated workforce and responsive local government were the main factors that attracted our business. 
When we visited the site we ultimately chose, our team was greeted by area educators who told us all about their strong public education system. 

City leaders informed us public infrastructure we would need, such as water, electricity, and sewer, and ready access to road, rail, and air transportation, was already in place at the proposed site. 

When we asked city officials how long it would take to obtain our building permits, they said:  “Just send us your blueprints.”

Everything was “ready to go.” 

In the end, we were able to stand up a successful and profitable new venture in record time, and to achieve significant growth in the local tax base and economy, offering hundreds of clean, high-tech manufacturing jobs to a responsive community.

That experience on the site selection team taught me two things:  the advanced manufacturing sector can really thrive in America, and we in government have a critical role to play.  
It will be the private sector and America’s entrepreneurs and innovators that will create jobs.  It is our job in government, though, to ensure our country is the most attractive choice for business investment. 

We can do it by reducing bureaucratic hurdles and investing in an educated workforce capable of high productivity and ongoing innovation. 

That’s the critical role we can play not only in getting Americans back to work but ensuring a bright and prosperous future for America’s middle class. 

Right now, far too many middle-class families are struggling not because they made poor choices but in spite of having made the right ones.  People who worked hard in school, who raised good families, who served in the military, who gave back by volunteering in their communities – Americans who did everything right – in this recession, they still lost their jobs. 

They need to know that we in Congress, are attentive to their needs and concerns, and that we have their backs.

The truth is, we are not going to be able to reopen all the plants that have closed and get those workers back on the assembly lines making the same products they used to make.  This is why we must make this push for the environment that will sustain advanced manufacturing. 

Thankfully, we’re not starting from scratch.  Innovative businesses, including many from my home state, have long been leaders in creating new manufacturing jobs based on new inventions. 

This, I believe, is the result of Delaware’s highly educated workforce and the state and local governments’ commitment to working with business as real partners toward growth. 

One of the most compelling examples of this partnership took place over the past two years.  More than one thousand people lost their jobs when General Motors shut down its plant in Newport, Delaware, in 2009, a plant that had been in production more than sixty years and was long touted as one of the most productive in the country. 

Some of those workers packed up their families and sought work elsewhere in the country.  Some stayed and found other work.  Too many are still looking today.

But they weren’t the only ones looking for jobs. Led by our tireless Governor, Jack Markell, those of us in state and local government in Delaware were engaged in a job search as well, and after months of searching and hard work, we were able to bring Fisker Automotive to Newport, Delaware, to take over and reinvest in the shuttered GM plant.  We did it by bringing together state and local officials, UAW union leaders, and federal tax credits and investments.  This partnership could not have been possible without five hundred million in federal stimulus funds. 

I was proud to be a small part of the team that brought Fisker to Delaware, but I’ll be even prouder to watch hundreds of Delawareans stream through the plant’s gates again when it reopens to build cutting-edge plug-in electric automobiles. 

When I asked the leadership of the new company what made them choose Delaware, it was a familiar answer – a skilled and reliable workforce, a responsive state and county governments, strong local infrastructure, and access to global markets through our roads, rails, and the Port of Wilmington.

Fisker is just one example.  In Delaware, we have recently seen DuPont, Ashland Chemical, Agilent, and Perdue invest in new facilities, new research or new production. 

My state has also been at the forefront of high-tech job growth with innovative Delaware companies like ILC Dover, Solar Dock, and Miller Metal, as well as multinationals like Sanosil, Motech, and Fraunhofer USA that have brought jobs there. 

I am proud that so many new products and technologies that are invented here are also “Made in America, Manufactured in Delaware.”

In Delaware, businesses have seen that we are “ready to go.” 

In our state, we have the ability to bring together stakeholders often seen as adversaries and deliver productive collaboration.  This involves labor and businesses making sacrifices and sharing responsibility. 

We need to replicate this model and these successes over the country as much as possible. 

Indeed, we are already seeing progress nationally, as the latest manufacturing numbers demonstrate.  In 2010, our manufacturing sector grew a hundred thirty-six thousand new jobs.  Some economists have predicted a further gain of more than double that this year. 

Despite long-standing predictions that American manufacturing was in a permanent decline, we are actually seeing a modest uptick, one on which we should capitalize. 

Mr. President, the formula for our economic success has long been the unstoppable combination of an innovative citizenry and investment in cutting-edge research.  This is what generates companies that invent new products, often high-tech and research-driven products, and, along with these, create skilled jobs right here in the United States. 

Investments in an educated workforce, our public infrastructure, and critical funding for research and development will be the keys to both short-term economic recovery and long-term growth.  These investments have to coincide with efforts to make it easier for Americans to start and expand small businesses and for multinational companies to locate advanced manufacturing here in America.

As we embark on this renewed effort, we must continue, to safeguard the important workplace safety, labor, and environmental protections we have put in place over the past decades.  Our manufacturing growth must be a function of innovation, not a turning-back of the clock. 

That is why I strongly support policies like extending the research and development tax credit, a new manufacturing tax credit tied to research and development done here, and in the extension of the Build America Bonds program for public infrastructure improvements.

We have unfinished work to do to change the focus of our tax and trade policies.  We must stop providing incentives to move our productive work offshore.   Instead, we should reward those companies that reinvest in America – in both inventing a new generation of products and in manufacturing them here.

We will also need to focus more of our attention on clean-energy manufacturing.  Government investment in clean energy technologies has been a core factor in our competitors’ growth. We need to help our own businesses to compete with them to catch up. 

I was disappointed, frankly, that the Senate was unable to reach an agreement to include the Advanced Energy Manufacturing Tax Credit in the bipartisan tax relief package we passed last December.  It is an example of the kinds of policies that will help spur the innovation, manufacturing, and new deployment that will generate clean-energy jobs.  I am encouraged, though, that it included funding for the Treasury Grant Program, which leverages private investment in clean-energy projects, for which I pushed along with a number of my colleagues to be included in the package. 

Additionally, if we wish to remain on the cutting edge of new clean-energy manufacturing technologies and retain our place as the global leader in scientific innovation, we need to pass more legislation like the America COMPETES Act.  In addition to creating ARPA-E, which makes strategic investments through the federal Department of Energy in game-changing technologies, it also focuses resources on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education.

I am proud to have been a cosponsor of the America COMPETES Act, which was so actively championed by my predecessor, Senator Ted Kaufman, who served Delaware so well.  This is just the type of legislation that I came here to support.

We need to find additional ways to expand educational opportunities for more of our students, especially in these fields essential to future competitiveness.  There is vital work to be done in ensuring that our business leaders are at the table as we renew America’s education policy, helping make certain that our schools are educating our children for the demands of the modern workplace. 

This is especially critical in light of recent international test scores that once again showed American students falling behind their competitors from Asia and Europe in reading, science, and math. 

A strong educational foundation is the launching pad for new ideas, which will soar to become tomorrow’s products and industries. 

To achieve this, we must have a strong federal investment in great teachers and strong schools, to set high standards matched with the resources to achieve them, and to engage parents, communities, and employers. 

We should never settle for just recovery.  We must reach for the prosperity and growth I know we can achieve together.  We can do it if we make these critical investments and changes in direction today.

That is why I am excited to get to work with my colleagues on a number of important legislative projects.  Because I believe we need to redouble our efforts to protect the fruits of that innovation through stronger protections for our intellectual property, I am proud to be an original cosponsor of the Patent Reform Act and look forward to working with Chairman Leahy on the Judiciary Committee toward its passage. 

Likewise, I found out this week that I will be serving on the Foreign Relations Committee, and I will be pushing for us to be tougher on our trading partners to ensure fairness and a level playing field for American exports, as well as new efforts to expand the range of our overseas markets.

I am honored to be a new member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committees, and I am eager to work with Chairman Bingaman, Senator Murkowski, and the other members on finding ways to spur clean-energy manufacturing here in America. 

As a member of the Budget Committee I look forward to working with my colleagues there to identify ways to address the deficit comprehensively and in line with our necessary priorities of simplifying the tax code, investing in our workforce, and incentivizing manufacturing job growth.

Outside of these committee assignments, I’m excited to get to work reinvigorating the Senate Manufacturing Caucus with many of my colleagues, including Senators Stabenow of Michigan, Brown of Ohio and Graham of South Carolina. We’re going to renew this chamber’s focus on what voters sent us here to do: restoring our economy by getting our neighbors back to work.

The American people have at times grown frustrated with the Senate because it seems as if this body has not realized the scale of our nation’s challenges; that legislators have taken a piecemeal approach to important policies and have failed to address our most difficult problems comprehensively.

Why are we not looking at tax policy, education policy, and job growth strategy collectively?  Our problems are interrelated, and the solutions must be as well.

Likewise, our budget deficit should not be treated merely as a talking point or a source of partisan advantage, but rather as the serious threat that it is. Real deficit reduction will come only with a careful approach and a willingness to share in the sacrifice.

Working together, we can change how we get things done here, and we can find a way to do it without jeopardizing the Senate’s vital role in our political system.

Even more importantly, at a time when many worry about the tone of our politics, we as Senators must do all we can to return this body to its founding mission as a stabilizing force in our political system. 

The Senate must lead by example and for this nation to be a source of civility, a beacon of cooperative spirit, and a place where we come together to address our greatest challenges.  

That’s how we’ll move forward together to solve our problems.  That’s how we’ll boost our manufacturing sector and get millions back to work.  And that’s how we’ll build a strong, prosperous, and sustainable future for America’s middle class. 

Those who have lost their jobs are doing their very best they can to find new ones.  We owe it to them to do our best, too – to be determined and deliberate, to focus on progress not partisanship, to be true to our principles, but not so unyielding in our positions that we make more news than progress.  
These are serious times, and our nation – our people – face tough challenges.  I look forward to working with each and every one of my new colleagues to bear down and work together to find innovative solutions, real solutions that will build a brighter future for all Americans.

Mr. President, I yield the floor.